| 查看: 456 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
关于转基因食品 长期,多代数动物喂养安全评估的实验综述
|
|
知道很多反转的人懒得查文献,所以就把这篇评估的综述放在这里,方便大家看。 http://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ... i/S0278691511006399 这是文章的摘要,结尾的结论是GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed。 The aim of this systematic review was to collect data concerning the effects of diets containing GM maize, potato, soybean, rice, or triticale on animal health. We examined 12 long-term studies (of more than 90 days, up to 2 years in duration) and 12 multigenerational studies (from 2 to 5 generations). We referenced the 90-day studies on GM feed for which long-term or multigenerational study data were available. Many parameters have been examined using biochemical analyses, histological examination of specific organs, hematology and the detection of transgenic DNA. The statistical findings and methods have been considered from each study. Results from all the 24 studies do not suggest any health hazards and, in general, there were no statistically significant differences within parameters observed. However, some small differences were observed, though these fell within the normal variation range of the considered parameter and thus had no biological or toxicological significance. If required, a 90-day feeding study performed in rodents, according to the OECD Test Guideline, is generally considered sufficient in order to evaluate the health effects of GM feed. The studies reviewed present evidence to show that GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed. |
» 猜你喜欢
售T0P一区SCI文章,我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售T0P一区SCI文章,我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
b口会评
已经有6人回复
信息学部会评时间
已经有3人回复
祈祷青基必中
已经有9人回复
在职考研
已经有7人回复
MSER送审了还被拒稿
已经有5人回复
关于如何从代码看上不上会
已经有14人回复
硝基还原
已经有5人回复
化学口会评?应用基础研究和基础研究,希望能分开
已经有3人回复
姜博1988
铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
尐吖头莪喜欢拽拽的过日孓!
- 应助: 77 (初中生)
- 金币: 5609.6
- 散金: 5670
- 红花: 208
- 沙发: 231
- 帖子: 11837
- 在线: 645.8小时
- 虫号: 2907753
- 注册: 2013-12-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 作物种质资源与遗传育种学

2楼2014-02-10 20:34:34











回复此楼