24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4039)
>虫友互识 (361)
>文献求助 (320)
>导师招生 (155)
>基金申请 (152)
>论文投稿 (90)
>休闲灌水 (76)
>博后之家 (75)
>招聘信息布告栏 (66)
>论文道贺祈福 (55)
>找工作 (51)
>硕博家园 (45)
>教师之家 (36)
>考博 (35)
>公派出国 (29)
>考研 (25)

返回列表

windwith

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 6 (幼儿园)
金币: 222.9
帖子: 215
在线: 98.3小时
虫号: 442837
注册: 2007-10-27
专业: 金属有机化学

[交流] 关于转基因食品长期，多代数动物喂养安全评估的实验综述

知道很多反转的人懒得查文献，所以就把这篇评估的综述放在这里，方便大家看。

http://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ... i/S0278691511006399

这是文章的摘要，结尾的结论是GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed。

The aim of this systematic review was to collect data concerning the effects of diets containing GM maize, potato, soybean, rice, or triticale on animal health. We examined 12 long-term studies (of more than 90 days, up to 2 years in duration) and 12 multigenerational studies (from 2 to 5 generations). We referenced the 90-day studies on GM feed for which long-term or multigenerational study data were available. Many parameters have been examined using biochemical analyses, histological examination of specific organs, hematology and the detection of transgenic DNA. The statistical findings and methods have been considered from each study. Results from all the 24 studies do not suggest any health hazards and, in general, there were no statistically significant differences within parameters observed. However, some small differences were observed, though these fell within the normal variation range of the considered parameter and thus had no biological or toxicological significance. If required, a 90-day feeding study performed in rodents, according to the OECD Test Guideline, is generally considered sufficient in order to evaluate the health effects of GM feed. The studies reviewed present evidence to show that GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed.

回复此楼