24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1293  |  回复: 8
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ccycyf

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 编辑回复结果,发愁,希望各位大侠赐教 已有8人参与

今天收到文章的外审结果如下: “reject”
信件大致内容为It has been reviewed by expert referees and on the basis of their decision the Editors regret to inform you that your paper is not to be accepted for publication.

The Journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article’s perceived priority. The main limitations detected in the manuscript leading to the present decision are:
1) The paper is too descriptive no advancing a hypothesis;
2) The papers uses products of uncertain chemical composition or unkown pr unclear activee ingredients;
3) The statsitics and/or equations are inappropriate or incorrect;
但是有一个审稿专家貌似还比较认可大致为This is an interesting manuscript that presents research on the use of *** as a tool for possible management of ***. It is obvious that significant work went into the research described, which...However, some aspects of the assays should be clarified: ...
请教各位大侠这样是不是按照专家提的建议认真改完以后重新寻找个杂志比较好啊,编辑的意思就是别再投该期刊了是吧??谢谢~~~
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Luckyzhou6

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
怎么会乐观啊!不过有真才实学的怎么都会发光
7楼2014-02-03 03:29:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

feixiaolin

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
看样子主要是文字表达方面的事情,做大幅度文字修改后重投也是不错的选择。
2楼2014-02-02 23:41:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
除非有本质的提高,否则还是改投吧
飞越无限
3楼2014-02-02 23:48:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

successfulsbl

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
还是换个杂志投吧。
4楼2014-02-02 23:54:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见