应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 100金币求助一个审稿人给的意见
51/1返回列表
查看: 1675  |  回复: 12
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

solskjaer300

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 100金币求助一个审稿人给的意见已有7人参与

投的 IEEE，一个审稿人刚开始说的缺乏原创性，不建议在IEEE发表，但是后面又说对于IEEE是个有益的补充。。搞不明白审稿人的态度，然后像这种缺乏原创性该如何回复呢？多谢大牛给意见！我怀疑是他中间给的意见是让我创新的，但是他的意见只是指出了我文章的一个概念性偏差。。所以真不知道这个审稿人是啥意思？第二个审稿人意见还好，最后编辑给的大修。
This paper is a useful contribution to the literature because it combines the analytics for the case of anisotropic scatter (following Rino) and the solution of the forth-order moment equation, in the strong scatter approximation.  However, it is not original and should not be published in the IEEE Transactions of Antennas and Propagation.
The paper is technically clear and well organized, but needs an English-speaking editor to correct the many language usage problems.  Also there are numerous typos in the section of Reference, including Refs 19, 25, 33.
The section on decorrelation distance (the paper calls this quantity “coherent length”) after two-way propagation is a bit confusing, as follows.  For one-way propagation, let us transmit a wave upwards from a point source through a distance z to a plane.  Let this be a two-dimensional example, so that the received field is a function only of x and the propagation distance z.  Then we can consider the decorrelation function between the field at two points x1 and x2 in the plane z.  The value of the distance x1-x2 where the decorrelation falls off to 1/e is the decorrelation distance.
Now for the case of two-way propagation, we transmit again a wave upwards from a point source a distance z to a plane.  Call this plane the reflecting plane.  Next the wave travels downwards back to the transmitter plane where it can be measured.  In this case, the decorrelation distance depends on the details of the reflection point(s) after the first (upwards) transmission.  If the plane is perfectly reflecting, one would measure a certain decorrelation distance.  If there were only a single point scatterer at the reflecting plane, then the decorrelation distance would be identical to that measured for one-way propagation in the downwards direction from the reflecting plane back to the plane where the transmitter is located.  It seems that this is the only consistent definition of the decorrelation distance that is useful to the case of two-way propagation.  Otherwise, the decorrelation distance depends on the redflecting plane, which can’t be correct.
This issue should be addressed in any revisions of this paper.
The paper would be a useful addition to the Antennas and Propagation Journal.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2014-01-20 10:44:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

solskjaer300

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by yinxineng at 2014-01-20 13:14:55
缺乏原创性:应该是你提出的观点没有新意，或表述不太明确
对于IEEE是个有益的补充：应该是你这一类的文章在IEEE上面相对较少，修改一下可以发表

个人意见，勿喷

那意思是按他的要求修改一下，这个审稿人会同意吗？那我应该再详细说说我的原创性吧？？
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2014-01-20 16:58:59
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

babero

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
solskjaer300: 金币+100, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-01-23 08:34:36
此审稿人整体的意见是此论文不是原创性的文章，不适合发表。具体提出下面的问题。但好的是编辑给出了大修的意见，说明编辑还是很认可这篇文章。
建议：逐一详细耐心回答此审稿人下面罗列的问题。最重要的是，在response to reviewer里详细说明此论文的意义及原创性。
好好改，接受应该没问题！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2014-01-20 10:52:31
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

syzhndx

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
那你就具体说说你研究的创新性，尽量往那块靠
赞一下 回复此楼
好好科研
3楼2014-01-20 11:05:33
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

D_L_J_2013

新虫 (小有名气)
努力

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
回复此楼
4楼2014-01-20 11:06:40
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭