| 查看: 1935 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wjlwyk新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
请问这样的情况要写信给编辑吗？
|
||
|
重写再投，编辑把文章给了原来两个审稿人，一个referee本来在上次就好评，说文章结论很有趣，这次给建议小修。 另外一个审稿人，上次要求文章重写，这次评价文章很有趣，但是要修改，给出8条具体意见，居然有3条本来就没有错误，三条修改建议和原文一模一样（他还以为我自己掉符号了，我查看原稿，发现没有掉绝对值符号）。由此推测，该referee当初下载返修文章的时候，有三个地方绝对值符号在他的电脑肯定无法显示。结果要我大修。 请问我要先跟编辑说明吗？如果再次修改还看不到绝对值符号怎么办？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
293求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
335求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
305求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
313求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
310求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
电气专硕320求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿西北工业大学289 085602
已经有33人回复
-
一志愿哈工大 085600 277 12材科基求调剂
已经有24人回复
-
268分085602化学工程调剂
已经有28人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 已经要求大修的文章，能给编辑写信说自己感觉审稿人不合适吗？
已经有13人回复
- apl文章接收了但是文章超出了四页，在proof前编辑部来信了封信，怎么处理啊？
已经有23人回复
- 给编辑写信询问审稿情况无回复
已经有10人回复
- 像这个情况下 ，我有必要写信给编辑要第3个人的审稿意见吗？？？
已经有6人回复
- 如何给Analyst的主编写信
已经有8人回复
- 文章接受后需要写信感谢编辑吗？
已经有15人回复
- 修回稿过期了，写信给编辑，编辑让 resubmission，可是提交不上
已经有6人回复
- 如何写信向编辑要审稿意见？
已经有4人回复
- 要修改通讯作者，怎样给SCI编辑写信？
已经有9人回复
- 大修，主编给了一个月的时间，能否向其写信请求延长修改稿提交的时间？
已经有11人回复
- 编辑这样的信件需要回复吗？
已经有4人回复
- 着急评副教授，能给国外编辑写信要求论文提前出版吗？
已经有15人回复
- 论文被拒后如何写信给编辑
已经有16人回复
- 文章ONLINE了，想早点正式出版，该怎么跟编辑写信呢
已经有14人回复
- JAPS什么时候给proof啊？、
已经有9人回复
- 在线投稿以后，怎么写信问编辑是否已经收到我的文章？
已经有10人回复
- 投稿被拒了，不甘心想写信给编辑，大家帮我看下该怎么写？
已经有10人回复
- 论文修改过期20天，可否给编委写信延长？
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】文献修改了近3个月没有投回去需要给编辑写信说明吗？
已经有6人回复
- 编辑发错审稿意见了如何写信询问
已经有15人回复
- 想给编辑写信，不知如何写，请指点
已经有7人回复
- 等待、撤稿、还是写信给编辑呢
已经有13人回复
wjlwyk
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1595.4
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 448
- 在线: 266.7小时
- 虫号: 1602919
- 注册: 2012-02-06
- 专业: 数理统计
|
Dear editor. As we consulted the latest revised article, we found that there are two equations (detailed comment 4 and 8) displayed just the right same forms as our referee 1 recommended in his detailed comments. It seems that some absolution symbols might not display in his computer. Moreover, the detailed comment 7 seems to have met the same problem. What shall we do if the same thing happens the next time we submit our revised article? As it might be our final chance. Although we can finish our modifications in no more than half an hour (as three of the detailed so called mistakes are originally right, just because of the wrong display of our referee’s computer), we are restless by the problem mentioned above and therefore want to be more careful about our article. Closed in attachment are our previously revised article and the corresponding latest feedback comments from our referee 1, both were downloaded from the “ScholarOne Manuscripts” system yesterday. Would you mind to verify the problem for us? Even if there are some mistakes, we are greatly impressed by our referees’ careful and highly qualified work, we read the comments in respect to find that even the slightest mistakes can be found by them.. Thank our referees for their careful work. Thank you very much for your kindness to give us the chance to revise our article. Thank you for you help and efficient work for our article. We are grateful to you timely feedback each time and are looking forward to hearing from you soon again. Sincerely yours |
7楼2013-12-11 09:10:23
wjlwyk
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1595.4
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 448
- 在线: 266.7小时
- 虫号: 1602919
- 注册: 2012-02-06
- 专业: 数理统计
|
Dear editor. As we consulted the latest revised article, we found that there are two places (detailed comment 4 and 8) displayed just the right same forms as our first referee recommended in his detailed commens. It seems that some absolution symbols might not display in our first referee's computer. Moreover, the detailed comment 7 seems to have meet the same problem. What shall we do about that? We are grateful to you timely feedback each time and are looking forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerly yours *** |
2楼2013-12-10 21:11:04
wjlwyk
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1595.4
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 448
- 在线: 266.7小时
- 虫号: 1602919
- 注册: 2012-02-06
- 专业: 数理统计
3楼2013-12-10 21:14:20
wjlwyk
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1595.4
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 448
- 在线: 266.7小时
- 虫号: 1602919
- 注册: 2012-02-06
- 专业: 数理统计
4楼2013-12-10 21:15:04
5