24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1786  |  回复: 7

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 请问这样的情况要写信给编辑吗?

重写再投,编辑把文章给了原来两个审稿人,一个referee本来在上次就好评,说文章结论很有趣,这次给建议小修。
另外一个审稿人,上次要求文章重写,这次评价文章很有趣,但是要修改,给出8条具体意见,居然有3条本来就没有错误,三条修改建议和原文一模一样(他还以为我自己掉符号了,我查看原稿,发现没有掉绝对值符号)。由此推测,该referee当初下载返修文章的时候,有三个地方绝对值符号在他的电脑肯定无法显示。结果要我大修。
请问我要先跟编辑说明吗?如果再次修改还看不到绝对值符号怎么办?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

Dear editor.
As we consulted the latest revised article, we found that there are two places (detailed comment 4 and 8) displayed just the right same forms as our first referee recommended in his detailed commens. It seems that some absolution symbols might not display in our first referee's computer. Moreover, the detailed comment 7 seems to have meet the same problem.
What shall we do about that?
We are grateful to you  timely feedback each time and are looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerly yours
***
2楼2013-12-10 21:11:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

there are two places  (detailed comments 4 and 8) displayed in our computers just the right same forms as our first referee recommended
3楼2013-12-10 21:14:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

请高手帮我顺下英文好吗?
4楼2013-12-10 21:15:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
按理说这是生成的pdf问题。审稿人在系统中下载的是pdf,所以你再次上传修改稿时一定要看在系统生成的pdf中这些符号是否正常显示,因为approve 这个pdf是你的责任。我就审过一些文章,pdf中的图都没有显示作者就投稿了,这样没办法只能先拒稿了。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

天下兴亡,我的责任!
5楼2013-12-11 07:14:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 啸天犬 at 2013-12-11 07:14:23
按理说这是生成的pdf问题。审稿人在系统中下载的是pdf,所以你再次上传修改稿时一定要看在系统生成的pdf中这些符号是否正常显示,因为approve 这个pdf是你的责任。我就审过一些文章,pdf中的图都没有显示作者就投稿 ...

我可能没有说清楚,我自己也是在系统下载自己上传approval后的论文,我的电脑中显示正确,但是,审稿人的电脑显示却没有绝对值符号
6楼2013-12-11 07:59:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 啸天犬 at 2013-12-11 07:14:23
按理说这是生成的pdf问题。审稿人在系统中下载的是pdf,所以你再次上传修改稿时一定要看在系统生成的pdf中这些符号是否正常显示,因为approve 这个pdf是你的责任。我就审过一些文章,pdf中的图都没有显示作者就投稿 ...

Dear editor.
As we consulted the latest revised article, we found that there are two equations (detailed comment 4 and 8) displayed just the right same forms as our referee 1 recommended in his detailed comments. It seems that some absolution symbols might not display in his computer. Moreover, the detailed comment 7 seems to have met the same problem.
What shall we do if the same thing happens the next time we submit our revised article? As it might be our final chance.
Although we can finish our modifications in no more than half an hour (as three of the detailed so called mistakes are originally right, just because of the wrong display of our referee’s computer), we are restless by the problem mentioned above and therefore want to be more careful about our article.
Closed in attachment are our previously revised article and the corresponding latest feedback comments from our referee 1, both were downloaded from the “ScholarOne Manuscripts” system yesterday. Would you mind to verify the problem for us?
Even if there are some mistakes, we are greatly impressed by our referees’ careful and highly qualified work, we read the comments in respect to find that even the slightest mistakes can be found by them.. Thank our referees for their careful work.
Thank you very much for your kindness to give us the chance to revise our article. Thank you for you help and efficient work for our article.
We are grateful to you timely feedback each time and are looking forward to hearing from you soon again.
Sincerely yours
7楼2013-12-11 09:10:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

不好意思,自己把求教的英文弄到回复里面去了,那位朋友给合理建议,或帮修改上述英文,我愿意给50论坛币。谢谢高手了先!
8楼2013-12-11 09:16:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wjlwyk 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见