| ²é¿´: 1898 | »Ø¸´: 7 | |||
wjlwykгæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇëÎÊÕâÑùµÄÇé¿öҪдПø±à¼Âð£¿
|
|
ÖØÐ´ÔÙͶ£¬±à¼°ÑÎÄÕ¸øÁËÔÀ´Á½¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬Ò»¸öreferee±¾À´ÔÚÉÏ´Î¾ÍºÃÆÀ£¬ËµÎÄÕ½áÂÛºÜÓÐȤ£¬Õâ´Î¸ø½¨ÒéСÐÞ¡£ ÁíÍâÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬ÉÏ´ÎÒªÇóÎÄÕÂÖØÐ´£¬Õâ´ÎÆÀ¼ÛÎÄÕºÜÓÐȤ£¬µ«ÊÇÒªÐ޸쬏ø³ö8Ìõ¾ßÌåÒâ¼û£¬¾ÓÈ»ÓÐ3Ìõ±¾À´¾ÍûÓдíÎó£¬ÈýÌõÐ޸Ľ¨ÒéºÍÔÎÄһģһÑù£¨Ëû»¹ÒÔΪÎÒ×Ô¼ºµô·ûºÅÁË£¬ÎҲ鿴Ը壬·¢ÏÖûÓеô¾ø¶ÔÖµ·ûºÅ£©¡£ÓÉ´ËÍÆ²â£¬¸Ãrefereeµ±³õÏÂÔØ·µÐÞÎÄÕµÄʱºò£¬ÓÐÈý¸öµØ·½¾ø¶ÔÖµ·ûºÅÔÚËûµÄµçÄԿ϶¨ÎÞ·¨ÏÔʾ¡£½á¹ûÒªÎÒ´óÐÞ¡£ ÇëÎÊÎÒÒªÏȸú±à¼ËµÃ÷Âð£¿Èç¹ûÔÙ´ÎÐ޸Ϲ¿´²»µ½¾ø¶ÔÖµ·ûºÅÔõô°ì£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏѧ˶080500£¬×Ü·Ö289·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
±±¿Æ281ѧ˶²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
276Çóµ÷¼Á¡£ÓаëÄêµç³ØºÍ°ëÄê¸ß·Ö×Óʵϰ¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
070300£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±º½320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0703 µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÒѾҪÇó´óÐÞµÄÎÄÕ£¬Äܸø±à¼Ð´ÐÅ˵×Ô¼º¸Ð¾õÉó¸åÈ˲»ºÏÊÊÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
aplÎÄÕ½ÓÊÕÁ˵«ÊÇÎÄÕ³¬³öÁËËÄÒ³£¬ÔÚproofǰ±à¼²¿À´ÐÅÁË·âÐÅ£¬Ôõô´¦Àí°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
¸ø±à¼Ð´ÐÅѯÎÊÉó¸åÇé¿öÎ޻ظ´
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÏñÕâ¸öÇé¿öÏ £¬ÎÒÓбØÒªÐ´ÐŸø±à¼ÒªµÚ3¸öÈ˵ÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÂ𣿣¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ¸øAnalystµÄÖ÷±àдÐÅ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ½ÓÊܺóÐèҪдПÐл±à¼Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ð޻ظå¹ýÆÚÁË£¬Ð´ÐŸø±à¼£¬±à¼Èà resubmission£¬¿ÉÊÇÌá½»²»ÉÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎдÐÅÏò±à¼ÒªÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÒªÐÞ¸ÄͨѶ×÷Õߣ¬ÔõÑù¸øSCI±à¼Ð´ÐÅ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
´óÐÞ£¬Ö÷±à¸øÁËÒ»¸öÔµÄʱ¼ä£¬ÄÜ·ñÏòÆäдÐÅÇëÇóÑÓ³¤Ð޸ĸåÌá½»µÄʱ¼ä£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
±à¼ÕâÑùµÄÐżþÐèÒª»Ø¸´Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
׿±ÆÀ¸±½ÌÊÚ£¬Äܸø¹úÍâ±à¼Ð´ÐÅÒªÇóÂÛÎÄÌáǰ³ö°æÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎı»¾ÜºóÈçºÎдПø±à¼
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕÂONLINEÁË£¬ÏëÔçµãÕýʽ³ö°æ£¬¸ÃÔõô¸ú±à¼Ð´ÐÅÄØ
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
JAPSʲôʱºò¸øproof°¡£¿¡¢
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÔÚÏßͶ¸åÒÔºó£¬ÔõôдÐÅÎʱà¼ÊÇ·ñÒѾÊÕµ½ÎÒµÄÎÄÕ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å±»¾ÜÁË£¬²»¸ÊÐÄÏëдПø±à¼£¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´Ï¸ÃÔõôд£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄÐ޸ĹýÆÚ20Ì죬¿É·ñ¸ø±àίдÐÅÑÓ³¤£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÎÄÏ×ÐÞ¸ÄÁ˽ü3¸öÔÂûÓÐͶ»ØÈ¥ÐèÒª¸ø±à¼Ð´ÐÅ˵Ã÷Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
±à¼·¢´íÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÁËÈçºÎдÐÅѯÎÊ
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ïë¸ø±à¼Ð´ÐÅ£¬²»ÖªÈçºÎд£¬ÇëÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
µÈ´ý¡¢³·¸å¡¢»¹ÊÇдПø±à¼ÄØ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
wjlwyk
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1595.4
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 448
- ÔÚÏß: 266.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1602919
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-06
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
|
Dear editor. As we consulted the latest revised article, we found that there are two places (detailed comment 4 and 8) displayed just the right same forms as our first referee recommended in his detailed commens. It seems that some absolution symbols might not display in our first referee's computer. Moreover, the detailed comment 7 seems to have meet the same problem. What shall we do about that? We are grateful to you timely feedback each time and are looking forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerly yours *** |
2Â¥2013-12-10 21:11:04
wjlwyk
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1595.4
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 448
- ÔÚÏß: 266.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1602919
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-06
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
3Â¥2013-12-10 21:14:20
wjlwyk
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1595.4
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 448
- ÔÚÏß: 266.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1602919
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-06
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
4Â¥2013-12-10 21:15:04
Ð¥ÌìÈ®
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 2171 (½²Ê¦)
- ½ð±Ò: 9715.1
- ºì»¨: 45
- Ìû×Ó: 3962
- ÔÚÏß: 302.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1362468
- ×¢²á: 2011-08-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ë®ÎĵØÖÊѧ(º¬µØÈȵØÖÊѧ)
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
| °´Àí˵ÕâÊÇÉú³ÉµÄpdfÎÊÌâ¡£Éó¸åÈËÔÚϵͳÖÐÏÂÔØµÄÊÇpdf£¬ËùÒÔÄãÔÙ´ÎÉÏ´«Ð޸ĸåʱһ¶¨Òª¿´ÔÚϵͳÉú³ÉµÄpdfÖÐÕâЩ·ûºÅÊÇ·ñÕý³£ÏÔʾ£¬ÒòΪapprove Õâ¸öpdfÊÇÄãµÄÔðÈΡ£ÎÒ¾ÍÉó¹ýһЩÎÄÕ£¬pdfÖеÄͼ¶¼Ã»ÓÐÏÔʾ×÷Õß¾ÍͶ¸åÁË£¬ÕâÑùû°ì·¨Ö»ÄÜÏȾܸåÁË¡£ |
» ±¾ÌûÒÑ»ñµÃµÄºì»¨£¨×îÐÂ10¶ä£©

5Â¥2013-12-11 07:14:23
wjlwyk
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1595.4
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 448
- ÔÚÏß: 266.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1602919
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-06
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
6Â¥2013-12-11 07:59:15
wjlwyk
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1595.4
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 448
- ÔÚÏß: 266.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1602919
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-06
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
|
Dear editor. As we consulted the latest revised article, we found that there are two equations (detailed comment 4 and 8) displayed just the right same forms as our referee 1 recommended in his detailed comments. It seems that some absolution symbols might not display in his computer. Moreover, the detailed comment 7 seems to have met the same problem. What shall we do if the same thing happens the next time we submit our revised article? As it might be our final chance. Although we can finish our modifications in no more than half an hour (as three of the detailed so called mistakes are originally right, just because of the wrong display of our referee¡¯s computer), we are restless by the problem mentioned above and therefore want to be more careful about our article. Closed in attachment are our previously revised article and the corresponding latest feedback comments from our referee 1, both were downloaded from the ¡°ScholarOne Manuscripts¡± system yesterday. Would you mind to verify the problem for us? Even if there are some mistakes, we are greatly impressed by our referees¡¯ careful and highly qualified work, we read the comments in respect to find that even the slightest mistakes can be found by them.. Thank our referees for their careful work. Thank you very much for your kindness to give us the chance to revise our article. Thank you for you help and efficient work for our article. We are grateful to you timely feedback each time and are looking forward to hearing from you soon again. Sincerely yours |
7Â¥2013-12-11 09:10:23
wjlwyk
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1595.4
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 448
- ÔÚÏß: 266.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1602919
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-06
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
8Â¥2013-12-11 09:16:06













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
wjlwyk