| 查看: 6328 | 回复: 23 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
投稿Corrosion Science被拒，求大牛给分析~~已有1人参与
|
||
|
论文写得有些长，工作做得比较系统，但字数比较多，有万多字吧(感觉有些多），主要是研究激光快速成型高强钢的腐蚀机理的，修改N次后，首次投稿。投稿后首先被技术审查退回要求改格式，主要是改语言，按要求改后EES投给Corrosion Science编辑部，然后就是漫长的等待，等了2个月一直处于submitted to journal, 实在憋不住了给EES发信问 Dear editor It has been two months that my manuscript has been delivered into the EES. The current states of this manuscript is still keeping in "submitted to Journal". In common, the state of paper will go on the next step, such as under review, no more than 1 month. Therefore, I suspect whether my paper is neglected by some unknown reasons? Or, is it in sequence due to lots of manuscripts? Could you make sure the state of my paper? I am sincerely waiting for your response~ EES reply(December 7,2013): Thank you for your email and please accept my apologies for the inconvenience this delay may have caused you. I have contacted the Editorial Office of the journal "Corrosion Science" to follow up on the status of your paper As soon as I have more information, I will be sending you an update via email. 当天Corrosion Science状态更新，主编直接给completely reject, 下面是原文： I regret to inform you that the English in this paper is so poor, that mammy parts are impossible to understand, and the paper is impossible to review. Because this is already supposed to have been corrected for language errors, I must take the decision to reject it. This journal requires a standard of English that is intelligible for the readers, including reviewers and editors, and should in fact, be correct English. Papers which are submitted in such poor English cannot be edited, and they must be rejected. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, G.T. Burstein Editor-in-Chief Corrosion Science 我想问下有相关经验的前辈，该拒稿除了语言原因，跟内容有直接关系吗？ 1，肯定语言达不到要求，且内容压根就没看直接Reject；2，语言达不到要求，内容也欠妥，Reject；3，语言有瑕疵，加上催信的态度，直接给Reject让我反省。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文提交二审还有三天就三个月了，连续问了编辑部几次
已经有10人回复
-
为何全世界都用JCR分区，咱们要弄个中科院分区？意义何在？
已经有6人回复
-
关于论文第一通讯作者的问题？
已经有7人回复
-
省基金太难了
已经有11人回复
-
论文被硕导卡
已经有8人回复
-
基金评审时，评审专家还回去看申请人代表作之外的文章吗？
已经有17人回复
-
CSC博士联培对将来就业有用吗
已经有6人回复
-
第75批博后面上 “应该是这两周”基金管理处的电话终于通了
已经有5人回复
-
暑假孩子一个人在家可以干什么
已经有10人回复
-
第17批博士后特别资助名单
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投elsevier的corrosion science 选错了open access 怎么办
已经有63人回复
- Corrosion Science 投稿系统通讯作者和manuscript里面不一致问题
已经有8人回复
- Corrosion Science投稿
已经有20人回复
- 求推荐期刊，SCT、corrosion science 或者美陶？
已经有3人回复
- Corrosion Science投稿
已经有15人回复
- Corrosion Science投稿
已经有8人回复
- corrosion science 被拒，大家看看，还能再投吗？
已经有25人回复
- 如何回复Corrosion Science评审专家的苛刻评审意见
已经有5人回复
- Corrosion science投稿编辑提问求助——重金求助
已经有14人回复
- 求问corrosion science这种证明开录用证明?
已经有12人回复
- Corrosion Science 投稿状态
已经有13人回复
- Corrosion Science的submitted to Journal状态问题
已经有7人回复
- Corrosion Science 退修
已经有7人回复
- elsevier，corrosion science 投稿时无法生成pdf文件
已经有6人回复
- 关于Corrosion Science投稿
已经有5人回复
- 大牛们觉得RSC中的Energy & Environmental Science怎么样？
已经有14人回复
10楼2013-12-09 22:21:22
5