| 查看: 3045 | 回复: 25 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
是不是被SCI录用了?能不能帮忙看看这个修改意见，好改吗？谢谢啦！！
|
||
|
Dear Research of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor N XXX We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "Research of Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network in Coal Mine Goaf", submitted to Wireless Personal Communications Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s). Attached, please find the reviewers' comments for your perusal. "If one or more reviewers have uploaded files related to their reviews, these files can be accessed by clicking on this link: Alternatively, the file(s) can be downloaded from your main menu by clicking on 'View Reviewer Attachments'. Please note that this link will not be available when there are no reviewer attachments." 5Comments for the Author: Reviewer #1: Suggestions for improvements: 1- Title is suggested to be changed as the "research in routing protocol for wireless sensor network in Coal Mine Goaf" is very general title and not reflecting specific research work proposed in this paper. Suggested title " proposal for efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor network in Coal Mine Goaf" 2- Abstract should highlight more the significance of the work in comparison with finding from literature to give the sense of research gap highlighted. 3- Please consider more nearest research and most updated ones as the author almost 85% depends on papers from 2007 and beyond and some of them chinese language. 4- Table-2 summarizing the processes of proposed algorithm is better to be represented in flowchart reflecting the proposed author methodologies. 5- Some sentences are ambiguous and should be considered in better phrasing for English paper publication. Example: "As coal mine goaf cannot be accessed by man". 6- Suggestions to evaluate the proposed algorithm with similar near-field algorithms in literature in term of algorithm complexity and computational cost. Reviewer #2: Authors have proposed a protocol named USEB-CMF to improve the safety of the monitoring system of coal mines. However paper has some issues: - 1) Some more related work should be included. 2) Architecture should be explained in more detail. 3) Algorithm/Pseudo code is not properly written and explained. 4) Some more work should be done for journal paper. Reviewer #3: Overall paper need to proof read for errors e.g. "transmission powder" in section 2 and "COMPTE_MSG" in algorithm 1 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
299求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿北京理工大学本科211材料工程294求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
300求调剂，材料科学英一数二
已经有8人回复
-
招收生物学/细胞生物学调剂
已经有5人回复
-
070305高分子化学与物理 304分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
289求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
一志愿哈尔滨工业大学材料与化工方向336分
已经有9人回复
-
081200-11408-276学硕求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
调剂求院校招收
已经有5人回复
-
调剂310
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求高人帮帮忙，帮我看看这个物质能不能合成出来，谢谢谢谢！！！！
已经有5人回复
- 第一次投sci，大家帮我看看这样的初审意见有希望吗
已经有22人回复
- 求助]帮忙看看这篇文章是否被SCI检索，谢谢
已经有5人回复
- 帮我看下这篇文章是不是SCI，如何判断是不是SCI？
已经有7人回复
- SSCI大修后再送另一审稿人被拒，请大家帮看一下意见
已经有32人回复
- SCI审稿意见求助，各位帮忙看看，是啥意思？该怎么修改？急！
已经有21人回复
- 能上SCI网站的朋友，帮忙看看这两篇文章的通讯作者是谁？
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮忙看看意见，谁有类似的回复，请帮忙提供点意见，谢谢！
已经有7人回复
- 刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见，如何回答审稿人？
已经有23人回复
- 第一次发sci期刊，请帮忙看下评审意见
已经有20人回复
- 请大家帮我看看这个杂志是不是SCI的？
已经有3人回复
- 请科研战绩的朋友们帮忙分析一下：返修的SCI论文，如果改数据会造成拒稿吗？
已经有4人回复
- 请帮忙查看文章是否已被SCI收录，谢谢！
已经有3人回复
- 请帮忙查看下面两篇文章是否已被SCI收录，谢谢！
已经有3人回复
- SCI文章的审稿意见，录用结果是只给注册投稿系统的邮箱发吗，谢谢！
已经有14人回复
- 投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）
已经有32人回复
- SCI文章已经In press了，感谢小木虫，散金币！发现一个小问题，可不可以改呀？
已经有69人回复
- 论文修改时，对拒稿的意见怎么回复？（两个接收，一个拒绝）
已经有50人回复
- 第一次投SCI，修改一次后被拒，该怎么办？急切！谢谢！
已经有51人回复
- 帮忙找找看看这个期刊是不是SCI？
已经有10人回复
- 投一期刊要求大改再投，准备改投，是否给这个期刊发个说明？
已经有19人回复
jy01779652
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3003
- 散金: 4
- 帖子: 56
- 在线: 362.8小时
- 虫号: 1218365
- 注册: 2011-03-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 食品科学基础
9楼2013-11-22 08:23:51
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2013-11-21 23:26:08
mythlo
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 3328.7
- 散金: 1034
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 2196
- 在线: 572.5小时
- 虫号: 1368782
- 注册: 2011-08-15
- 专业: 光学信息获取与处理
4楼2013-11-22 00:41:27
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2013-11-22 00:46:30
