| 查看: 7066 | 回复: 216 | |||
[交流]
critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences 据稿重投
|
|||
|
本人九月底在critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences投稿一篇仿生的综述，在此之前即2012年已经有一篇类似的文章发表了"biomimicry via electrospinning"，现在编辑部回信直接据稿，说文章不符合他们的期刊要求，让我另选其他期刊，但是其中一个审稿人给了不少修改意见并说修改可用。说实在的，我投稿的文章确实存在严重不足，但是经过我近一个月的修改，个人认为已经是超越了原来那一稿的，也在一定程度上做到了上述审稿人的一些修改意见，并且修改后的稿件对biomimicry via electrospinning是一种补充，更是一种进步，请问我还能重新投稿吗？如果这样，该怎么做？谢谢各位大神的回复。 注：该期刊在同类期刊排名较好，一年只有四期，大概不到一百篇文章吧。 下面是具体的回复信息： 13-Nov-2013 Dear Mr Ke: I regret to inform you that our reviewers have now considered your paper but unfortunately feel it unsuitable for publication in Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. For your information I attach the reviewer comments at the bottom of this email. I hope you will find them to be constructive and helpful. You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so. Thank you for considering Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Professor Sigmund Editor in Chief, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences solidstateandmaterials@gmail.com Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author In this article, the author presented an overview of various biomimetic structure fabricated by electrospinning technique. The article did cover a wide range of bio-inspired structures. However, the manuscript does not have a coherent storyline and lacks in-depth discussion in each topic picked. Thus it is recommended that the article should be revised before accepted. Some concerns/suggestions of the article are as follows: In the presentation of some biomimetic structures, the pick of the artificial surface is arbitrary while the discussion is missing. Example: Page 5, Figure 5c: from the pick of the SEM image I didn’t see anything that resemble the targeted hierarchical feather surface. Also in this section the author did not discuss anything about the artificial surface, i.e. property, mechanism except for the synthesis. Page 5, line 33: from the description of the original dissertation as presented by Dr. Ma, it is kinds of arbitrary to assert that the co—polymer fiber structure resembles the structure on butterfly wings, or at least as presented in figure 6. Page 6, figure 7c vs figure 7d and figure 7e: comparing the nature and artificial surfaces, it is kinds of dubious that they can be claimed similar. Also the discussion is not enough. Page 7, linge 5: the author just wrote “They found the structure of the prepared fibers were similar to that of the spider silk.” There is no evidence to prove this simple statement, nor any discussion about the implication and applications of this finding. This is not a general discussion or conclusion section at the end of this paper, which makes the end of this article seemingly arbitrary. In general, the author might consider present the information more logically and more in-depth, with contribution from the knowledge of the author himself rather than just describing what was done by others. Another major problem with the paper is the reproduction permission of the figures. The author just get random figures from different literatures and put them together without getting permissions. Reproduction permission needs to be obtained (possibly from the publisher) and state clearly at the end of each figure to prevent potential plagiarism problems. For a review article as this is, 41 references are far from enough. This goes back to the first point, that the author could get a more systematic view of the topics by reading more papers than just commenting on one paper in each specific topic. Page 3, line 28: the author mentioned about figure 3e, but where is it? Page 4, line 12: the author mentioned that “the diameter of setae rangs (ranges) from 3mm down to several hundred nanometres (nanometers) and most are roughly 50 micron…” This is over 4 orders of magnitude difference. Can the author assure that the setae talked about is one type of setae or there are actually several different bio-structures on water strider legs? It would be kinds of astonishing that a single type of structure can have such wide range of size distribution. The author needs to work more on the language and spelling (e.g. see previous point). If possible, work with a native speaker to make the illustration clearer. In page 6, line 10-14, why there is a sudden change in the line spacing? Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The writing in this paper needs substantial work. A successful review paper's primary goal is to clearly explain the work of others and to tie the research together. The paper does not clearly do this. It also appears incomplete as there are no concluding remarks. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
-
真诚求助：手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心，有什么渠道能发核心吗
已经有6人回复
-
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有14人回复
-
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
-
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
坐标深圳，诚征女友
+1/163
-
双面压敏硅胶胶带
+2/92
-
招贤纳博（已结束）
+1/74
-
因为雪而勾起的一些往事
+1/72
-
Call for papers，征稿
+1/70
-
北京化工大学生命科学与技术学院岗位招聘信息
+1/64
-
医学检验方向招收申请考核博士研究生
+2/34
-
中国矿业大学博士招生
+1/34
-
北京理工大学国家杰青梁军教授课题组招聘2026级博士研究生
+1/30
-
华北电力大学（北京）（第一性原理计算）博士招生——学博，专博各1人
+2/22
-
2025君科院博士研究生招生欢迎报考
+2/12
-
中科院新疆理化技术研究所人工智能生物医学团队现招聘博士后
+1/10
-
湖南大学2026博士招生
+1/7
-
澳大利亚南昆士兰大学（UniSQ）量子点课题组 招收CSC全奖博士生
+1/6
-
长江大学武汉校区诚招工程热物理、油气、电气等新能源博士-2025
+1/5
-
长江学者团队招聘高校教师7名(地点杭州、有事业编)+博后5名
+1/4
-
想替换掉环状DNA中心通道中的金属离子 如何替换才是正确操作
+1/4
-
同济大学高绍荣院士王冕课题组诚聘博士后
+1/3
-
北京理工大学珠海校区徐先臣课题组招聘博士后/硕博士
+1/2
-
上海交通大学AIMS-Lab招收AI for Science方向2026级博士生
+1/1
3楼2013-11-14 10:22:48
6楼2013-11-14 10:35:07
7楼2013-11-14 10:52:32
13楼2013-11-14 11:05:15
23楼2013-11-14 11:33:12
24楼2013-11-14 11:34:16
36楼2013-11-14 11:52:15
39楼2013-11-14 12:03:15
45楼2013-11-14 12:13:08
49楼2013-11-14 12:18:13
50楼2013-11-14 12:18:14
简单回复
nono20092楼
2013-11-14 10:19
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
2013-11-14 10:26
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shichong5楼
2013-11-14 10:27
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-11-14 10:57
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
dlbrians9楼
2013-11-14 11:02
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
readytogo10楼
2013-11-14 11:03
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
aboluo19833111楼
2013-11-14 11:04
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lmz110112楼
2013-11-14 11:04
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shinyzd14楼
2013-11-14 11:08
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
支持
lefantian12215楼
2013-11-14 11:17
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gyfwon16楼
2013-11-14 11:18
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sddhxr17楼
2013-11-14 11:19
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wuning88818楼
2013-11-14 11:23
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
上海四缤19楼
2013-11-14 11:23
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
jibif20楼
2013-11-14 11:23
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空21楼
2013-11-14 11:28
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clarktao22楼
2013-11-14 11:31
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
段小飞25楼
2013-11-14 11:34
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ycsdzg26楼
2013-11-14 11:34
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
doctorbang27楼
2013-11-14 11:36
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
time8828楼
2013-11-14 11:37
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wlxiao29楼
2013-11-14 11:37
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xiaomu7830楼
2013-11-14 11:38
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhoupeng8731楼
2013-11-14 11:40
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
huaxiduan32楼
2013-11-14 11:42
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
tianjun50233楼
2013-11-14 11:49
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
长风相伴34楼
2013-11-14 11:51
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clszdy35楼
2013-11-14 11:52
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
virologik37楼
2013-11-14 12:00
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhangheng07938楼
2013-11-14 12:01
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xianzhi201040楼
2013-11-14 12:09
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
haixiawu41楼
2013-11-14 12:10
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shiyiren42楼
2013-11-14 12:11
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zxf_201543楼
2013-11-14 12:12
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gter_wang44楼
2013-11-14 12:12
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liulinkk46楼
2013-11-14 12:14
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhiyongwang47楼
2013-11-14 12:15
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
handsomewood48楼
2013-11-14 12:16
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与