应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences 据稿重投
2171/5返回列表12345下一页
查看: 7055  |  回复: 216
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

aming_1230

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences 据稿重投

本人九月底在critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences投稿一篇仿生的综述，在此之前即2012年已经有一篇类似的文章发表了"biomimicry via electrospinning"，现在编辑部回信直接据稿，说文章不符合他们的期刊要求，让我另选其他期刊，但是其中一个审稿人给了不少修改意见并说修改可用。说实在的，我投稿的文章确实存在严重不足，但是经过我近一个月的修改，个人认为已经是超越了原来那一稿的，也在一定程度上做到了上述审稿人的一些修改意见，并且修改后的稿件对biomimicry via electrospinning是一种补充，更是一种进步，请问我还能重新投稿吗？如果这样，该怎么做？谢谢各位大神的回复。
注：该期刊在同类期刊排名较好，一年只有四期，大概不到一百篇文章吧。
下面是具体的回复信息：
13-Nov-2013
Dear Mr Ke:
I regret to inform you that our reviewers have now considered your paper but unfortunately feel it unsuitable for publication in Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences.   For your information I attach the reviewer comments at the bottom of this email.  I hope you will find them to be constructive and helpful.  You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so.
Thank you for considering Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.
Sincerely,
Professor Sigmund
Editor in Chief, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences
solidstateandmaterials@gmail.com


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
In this article, the author presented an overview of various biomimetic structure fabricated by electrospinning technique. The article did cover a wide range of bio-inspired structures. However, the manuscript does not have a coherent storyline and lacks in-depth discussion in each topic picked. Thus it is recommended that the article should be revised before accepted.
Some concerns/suggestions of the article are as follows:
In the presentation of some biomimetic structures, the pick of the artificial surface is arbitrary while the discussion is missing. Example:
Page 5, Figure 5c: from the pick of the SEM image I didn’t see anything that resemble the targeted hierarchical feather surface. Also in this section the author did not discuss anything about the artificial surface, i.e. property, mechanism except for the synthesis.
Page 5, line 33: from the description of the original dissertation as presented by Dr. Ma, it is kinds of arbitrary to assert that the co—polymer fiber structure resembles the structure on butterfly wings, or at least as presented in figure 6.
Page 6, figure 7c vs figure 7d and figure 7e: comparing the nature and artificial surfaces, it is kinds of dubious that they can be claimed similar. Also the discussion is not enough.
Page 7, linge 5: the author just wrote “They found the structure of the prepared fibers were similar to that of the spider silk.” There is no evidence to prove this simple statement, nor any discussion about the implication and applications of this finding.
This is not a general discussion or conclusion section at the end of this paper, which makes the end of this article seemingly arbitrary.
In general, the author might consider present the information more logically and more in-depth, with contribution from the knowledge of the author himself rather than just describing what was done by others.
Another major problem with the paper is the reproduction permission of the figures. The author just get random figures from different literatures and put them together without getting permissions. Reproduction permission needs to be obtained (possibly from the publisher) and state clearly at the end of each figure to prevent potential plagiarism problems.
For a review article as this is, 41 references are far from enough. This goes back to the first point, that the author could get a more systematic view of the topics by reading more papers than just commenting on one paper in each specific topic.
Page 3, line 28: the author mentioned about figure 3e, but where is it?
Page 4, line 12: the author mentioned that “the diameter of setae rangs (ranges) from 3mm down to several hundred nanometres (nanometers) and most are roughly 50 micron…” This is over 4 orders of magnitude difference. Can the author assure that the setae talked about is one type of setae or there are actually several different bio-structures on water strider legs? It would be kinds of astonishing that a single type of structure can have such wide range of size distribution.
The author needs to work more on the language and spelling (e.g. see previous point). If possible, work with a native speaker to make the illustration clearer.
In page 6, line 10-14, why there is a sudden change in the line spacing?

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
The writing in this paper needs substantial work. A successful review paper's primary goal is to clearly explain the work of others and to tie the research together. The paper does not clearly do this. It also appears incomplete as there are no concluding remarks.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2013-11-14 10:16:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aming_1230

金虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2013-11-14 10:19:57
祝福

感谢！不知道你有什么好的建议没有
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2013-11-14 10:22:48
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zsc78

银虫 (著名写手)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
个人觉得还是考虑其它杂志吧，跟这个杂志档次差不多的也可以。祝福楼主好运连连！
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2013-11-14 10:35:07
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lwt408

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
建议将审稿人的意见抄送给编辑部，重新投稿，再试一下，如果仍拒稿，只能改投了
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2013-11-14 10:52:32
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ttmany7788

铁虫 (知名作家)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
深深祝福
回复此楼
13楼2013-11-14 11:05:15
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aming_1230

金虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by zsc78 at 2013-11-14 10:35:07
个人觉得还是考虑其它杂志吧，跟这个杂志档次差不多的也可以。祝福楼主好运连连！

那能推荐几个类似的期刊吗？我的主题是仿生与静电纺
赞一下 回复此楼
23楼2013-11-14 11:33:12
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aming_1230

金虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by lwt408 at 2013-11-14 10:52:32
建议将审稿人的意见抄送给编辑部，重新投稿，再试一下，如果仍拒稿，只能改投了

人家是投稿软件投稿的，那这样做，是不是要重新写cover letter啊
赞一下 回复此楼
24楼2013-11-14 11:34:16
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

2011111111

木虫 (文坛精英)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
从审稿意见上看文章还是存在不少问题的，包括楼主的态度，对文章改完后都没有仔细的读上即便，以至于各种错误的存在。当然，致命的上还是在于文章的一个总体的思路上，文章思路不清晰，没有能够说清楚当前的研究现状并且到结尾也没有给出一个科学的较为合理的结论性的语句。因此建议楼主还要进行大改。（纯属个人意见，仅供参考）
赞一下 回复此楼
36楼2013-11-14 11:52:15
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

芍药笼烟

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝楼主一切顺利，家人健康快乐，爱人开心幸福！
赞一下 回复此楼
39楼2013-11-14 12:03:15
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

heyutang

铁虫 (著名写手)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
个人觉得还是考虑其它杂志吧，跟这个杂志档次差不多的也可以。
赞一下 回复此楼
45楼2013-11-14 12:13:08
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

niu.bi

木虫 (文坛精英)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Good luck
回复此楼
49楼2013-11-14 12:18:13
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wendy3

金虫 (文坛精英)
★
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
深深祝福
回复此楼
50楼2013-11-14 12:18:14
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
nono20092楼
2013-11-14 10:19   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
iwuzetian4楼
2013-11-14 10:26   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shichong5楼
2013-11-14 10:27   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chenyh7188楼
2013-11-14 10:57   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
dlbrians9楼
2013-11-14 11:02   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
readytogo10楼
2013-11-14 11:03   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
aboluo19833111楼
2013-11-14 11:04   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lmz110112楼
2013-11-14 11:04   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shinyzd14楼
2013-11-14 11:08   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
支持
lefantian12215楼
2013-11-14 11:17   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gyfwon16楼
2013-11-14 11:18   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sddhxr17楼
2013-11-14 11:19   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wuning88818楼
2013-11-14 11:23   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
上海四缤19楼
2013-11-14 11:23   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
jibif20楼
2013-11-14 11:23   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空21楼
2013-11-14 11:28   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clarktao22楼
2013-11-14 11:31   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
段小飞25楼
2013-11-14 11:34   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ycsdzg26楼
2013-11-14 11:34   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
doctorbang27楼
2013-11-14 11:36   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
time8828楼
2013-11-14 11:37   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wlxiao29楼
2013-11-14 11:37   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xiaomu7830楼
2013-11-14 11:38   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhoupeng8731楼
2013-11-14 11:40   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
huaxiduan32楼
2013-11-14 11:42   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
tianjun50233楼
2013-11-14 11:49   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
长风相伴34楼
2013-11-14 11:51   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clszdy35楼
2013-11-14 11:52   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
virologik37楼
2013-11-14 12:00   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhangheng07938楼
2013-11-14 12:01   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xianzhi201040楼
2013-11-14 12:09   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
haixiawu41楼
2013-11-14 12:10   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shiyiren42楼
2013-11-14 12:11   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zxf_201543楼
2013-11-14 12:12   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gter_wang44楼
2013-11-14 12:12   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liulinkk46楼
2013-11-14 12:14   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhiyongwang47楼
2013-11-14 12:15   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
handsomewood48楼
2013-11-14 12:16   回复  
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 aming_1230 的主题更新
2171/5返回列表12345下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭