24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1728  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

aaa_dujiang

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 请大侠看下审稿人意见,怎么回复?

Comments to the Author
1 - The experimental needs a lot of work. How did you do fluorescence measurements? What electrolyte did you test in? Did you use NMP in your slurry? These are just example of what is missing. Please be MUCH more detail oriented in this section.

2 - How do Zn and O from fluorescence lead you to conclude that "the pyrolitic products is stoichiometric "?? That seems impossible based on there being O in the cathode material.

3 - Can you really use 5 significant figures in reported gravimetric capacities?

4 - Page 4, lines 31 - 36. I think that claim is too strong given the figure. Also, line 56 to page 5 line 2 - the sentence beginning "Especially..." I don't think you can make such a claim when you show just one cell having better capacity retention between 40-50 cycles. The fact that that cell had lower capacity during cycles 1-40 make it likely to have better retention at cycle 50.

有些看不懂啊 求各位帮看看,另外回答要怎么弄?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

HADH

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by aaa_dujiang at 2013-11-13 17:44:15
谢谢 这还有希望吗? 重做试验是不可能了 这情况该怎么回复啊?...

找你们专业的理论高手帮你改改,分析实验机理和推导结论。
7楼2013-11-13 17:47:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

醋人

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
说你做的工作太少,基础知识太差,不严谨,应该是完了
精专业、强意志、壮身体
2楼2013-11-13 12:02:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aaa_dujiang

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 醋人 at 2013-11-13 12:02:48
说你做的工作太少,基础知识太差,不严谨,应该是完了

不会吧 能不能详细点啊 谢谢啦
3楼2013-11-13 16:07:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

RXMCDM

版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
aaa_dujiang: 金币+5, 有帮助 2013-11-14 09:33:03
提了一大堆问题,没有叫你如何改,也没有说用稿的意思,其实就是拒稿,除非你能按他的意思从做实验!!!
4楼2013-11-13 16:25:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见