24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2365  |  回复: 14

ashram1986

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 收到编辑这样一封信,大家觉重新投中的概率如何? 已有7人参与

Dear Dr :

Your manuscript entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx" which you submitted to International Journal of Green Energy, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in International Journal of Green Energy. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered.

You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript.  Instead, revise your
manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.

Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/green-energy and login to your Author Centre.  Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number.  Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to International Journal of Green Energy, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.

I look forward to a resubmission.

Sincerely,




Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Editorial Office's comments to the author:

(1) the reference style and format must be revised to comply with the journal requirement.

(2) Figures 2-9: the texts in the figures are too small, they should be increased for legibility (at least to the same size as the text in the main body of the paper).



大家觉得重新投的话中的概率高吗?
PS:前面编辑说的很严重,要major revision,但是后面的修改意见确实2个格式方面的。。。。。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

hal_ewan

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
从你这个情况来看,建议直接写信给这个编辑询问提出major concern的那个专家意见再决定怎么修改。
2楼2013-10-23 00:07:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
Reviewer(s)' Comments就是直接接受嘛,你问问还有没有别的意见。如果没有100%接受
飞越无限
3楼2013-10-23 00:15:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tjyych

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你这里列举的2个关于格式的修改只是编辑的意见,而审稿人意见一栏里是空的,真的很奇怪,看看你收到的信里是否有附件,如果没有的话,需要找编辑要,只有知道了审稿人的具体意见,才好做下一步的决定、是否再重新投稿
4楼2013-10-23 00:24:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

朱洲贺

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

不是很看的懂

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
发文章
5楼2013-10-23 00:44:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Altlantis

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
感觉编辑好真诚的说,写了那么多。

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
6楼2013-10-23 07:59:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ashram1986

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by hal_ewan at 2013-10-23 00:07:45
从你这个情况来看,建议直接写信给这个编辑询问提出major concern的那个专家意见再决定怎么修改。

已经发了邮件,等待
7楼2013-10-23 08:44:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ashram1986

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by kingki at 2013-10-23 00:15:54
Reviewer(s)' Comments就是直接接受嘛,你问问还有没有别的意见。如果没有100%接受

希望如此吧
8楼2013-10-23 08:45:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ashram1986

铜虫 (小有名气)

之前状态有under review过,但是时间不长就给了这个邮件。。。
9楼2013-10-23 14:38:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ali-wang

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
修改以后,再次提交!然后,再审!
骐骥一跃,不能十步;驽马十驾,功在不舍!
10楼2013-10-23 15:32:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ashram1986 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见