24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ashram1986

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 1074.2
散金: 5
红花: 1
帖子: 57
在线: 399.1小时
虫号: 1866451
注册: 2012-06-21
性别: GG
专业: 石油天然气开采

[交流] 收到编辑这样一封信，大家觉重新投中的概率如何？已有7人参与

Dear Dr :

Your manuscript entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx" which you submitted to International Journal of Green Energy, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in International Journal of Green Energy. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered.

You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript.  Instead, revise your
manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.

Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/green-energy and login to your Author Centre.  Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number.  Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to International Journal of Green Energy, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.

I look forward to a resubmission.

Sincerely,

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Editorial Office's comments to the author:

(1) the reference style and format must be revised to comply with the journal requirement.

(2) Figures 2-9: the texts in the figures are too small, they should be increased for legibility (at least to the same size as the text in the main body of the paper).

大家觉得重新投的话中的概率高吗？
PS:前面编辑说的很严重，要major revision,但是后面的修改意见确实2个格式方面的。。。。。

回复此楼