| 查看: 2518 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
ashram1986铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
收到编辑这样一封信，大家觉重新投中的概率如何？ 已有7人参与
|
||
|
Dear Dr : Your manuscript entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx" which you submitted to International Journal of Green Energy, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter. I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in International Journal of Green Energy. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/green-energy and login to your Author Centre. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to International Journal of Green Energy, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission. I look forward to a resubmission. Sincerely, Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Editorial Office's comments to the author: (1) the reference style and format must be revised to comply with the journal requirement. (2) Figures 2-9: the texts in the figures are too small, they should be increased for legibility (at least to the same size as the text in the main body of the paper). 大家觉得重新投的话中的概率高吗？ PS:前面编辑说的很严重，要major revision,但是后面的修改意见确实2个格式方面的。。。。。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料292调剂
已经有11人回复
-
269专硕求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
0703化学/290求调剂/本科经历丰富/工科也可
已经有8人回复
-
0856材料化工调剂 总分330
已经有7人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
315调剂
已经有5人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料与化工考研调剂
已经有16人回复
-
299求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料求调剂
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投了一篇JPBA，三个月给拒了，编辑的拒信
已经有43人回复
6楼2013-10-23 07:59:31
2楼2013-10-23 00:07:45
kingki
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 465 (硕士)
- 金币: 23654.3
- 散金: 6301
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 7935
- 在线: 601.3小时
- 虫号: 514983
- 注册: 2008-02-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
3楼2013-10-23 00:15:54
4楼2013-10-23 00:24:34
