24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 9018  |  回复: 128
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

liguan525

银虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 每次写审稿意见都发愁,有没有虫友愿意分享自己的SCI论文审稿意见?

经常要给一些英文论文写审稿意见,农学,作物科学相关的,或者生物类的,希望虫友们友情分享一下自己的审稿意见,给我参考一下吧,英文的哦,非常感谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bachier

金虫 (职业作家)


同一篇文章被拒的:
Referee 1:

Importance: D) important but too specialized

Hypotheses Yes/No: Yes

Appropriate Length: Yes

Different Journal:  

Recommend Acceptance: D) No

Referee Letter: Authors reported preparation of hollow Pt nanostructures (such as nanoring and nanocage) via selective etching of gold nanoparticle seed and controlled growth of Pt. The method involves heating gold seed in presence of iodide, polymer (PVP) and platinum salt. A new mechanism of hollow Pt nanostructures formation is proposed that involves selective etching of gold surface by iodide/iodine that acts as active site for Pt deposition. This selective etching leads to controlled deposition of Pt at specific sites of Au seed, leading to different hollow Pt structures --- depending on Au seed used. The work is studied in great care. However, the subject matters such as seeding growth, hollow metal nanoparticle preparation (either via Kirkendall effect or Galvanic deposition) are reported by many works and similar structures are observed earlier. Thus high significance of this work is not apparent. This work may be more suitable in specialized journals like J. Phys. Chem C or J Mater. Chem.

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

110楼2013-10-21 21:05:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 129 个回答

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
这个好像没有模板吧。觉得好就给修改机会,不好就毙掉,找出理由就是
4楼2013-10-21 14:24:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

haier20022

新虫 (正式写手)



liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
楼主好厉害,已经是审稿人了
12楼2013-10-21 14:48:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见