| 查看: 9250 | 回复: 128 | ||||
[交流]
每次写审稿意见都发愁,有没有虫友愿意分享自己的SCI论文审稿意见?
|
||||
| 经常要给一些英文论文写审稿意见,农学,作物科学相关的,或者生物类的,希望虫友们友情分享一下自己的审稿意见,给我参考一下吧,英文的哦,非常感谢! |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
宝贵经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
一志愿 江南大学 085602 化工专硕 338分求调剂
已经有8人回复
304求调剂(085602,过四级,一志愿985)
已经有15人回复
工科求调剂
已经有15人回复
求调剂
已经有5人回复
277求调剂
已经有3人回复
化学0703-一志愿211-338分求调剂
已经有4人回复
266分,一志愿电气工程,本科材料,求材料专业调剂
已经有8人回复
材料调剂
已经有3人回复
22408 总分320,一篇论文二作,两个国三,求调剂
已经有4人回复
313求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
这样的审稿意见如何回复
已经有5人回复
被一SCI期刊邀请当作审稿人了,我的论文还在Under Review
已经有11人回复
本人第一篇SCI文章,求如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有5人回复
请问综述性的中文文章怎么审稿?如何写审稿意见?
已经有5人回复
投稿SCI,审稿意见求助
已经有8人回复
SCI编辑一定会找自己推荐的审稿人吗
已经有22人回复
刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见,如何回答审稿人?
已经有23人回复
sci如何回复审稿意见,尤其是改格式的审稿意见?
已经有8人回复
投SCI外刊,如何回复审稿意见,谢谢!!!
已经有6人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
怎么回复中文期刊的审稿意见,有没有模板啊?
已经有4人回复
求SCI文章审稿人二审意见
已经有24人回复
投稿SCI期刊(小修),编辑给的意见,有经验的虫友们给出出主意啊!
已经有15人回复
会议论文同意接收后,怎么对待审稿意见?
已经有9人回复
SCI投稿审稿人意见是这样的怎么回复?
已经有9人回复
SCI审稿有审稿费吗
已经有16人回复
SCI文章审稿人意见回来,却不知如何答复,请各位前辈指点
已经有7人回复
第一次投sci的审稿意见,小虫请教~
已经有14人回复
我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
物理学 调剂
+1/91
济南大学前沿交叉科学研究院新能源材料与传感器件团队 2026研究生调剂招生
+1/87
广东工业大学-木质纤维素高值化利用团队招博士研究生
+1/86
各位老师:山东科技大学化学与生物工程学院2026年硕士研究生调剂公告
+1/85
广东五邑大学夏旺课题组硕士调剂公告
+1/41
重庆科技大学新能源与电子信息材料团队招收化学、物理、材料类调剂生
+1/13
【博士招生】武汉科技大学招收材料、化工、环境、冶金类2026年“申请-考核”制博士生
+1/13
太原科技大学材料科学与工程学院“03高性能轻质合金及新能源材料”学硕与专硕有缺额
+1/10
长江大学智能钻井方向硕士调剂
+1/8
烟台大学精准材料高等研究院26年材料方向研究生招生
+1/7
化学与精细化工广东省实验室-汕头大学2026年联合培养硕士研究生调剂招生
+1/6
招收2026级研究生
+1/5
渤海大学材料与环境工程学院发光及透明陶瓷材料、地聚物吸波混凝土方向接收研究生调剂
+1/5
【招收调剂】07/08/09学生看过来 环境 农业 生态学 生物 化学 计算机 材料 市政
+1/5
武汉工程大学化学与环境工程学院 2026 年硕士研究生调剂公告
+1/2
大连工业大学轻工与化学工程学院招工科调剂生
+2/2
【博士招生】广东工业大学国家优青课题组招收2026年博士生(环境/化学/材料/微生物)
+1/2
2026年北京服装学院- 纺织化学与染整工程-刘老师可招收化学相关专业考研调剂
+1/1
天津工业大学双一流高校招博士、调剂硕士、博士后
+1/1
硕士研究生调剂招生
+1/1
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
我的给你分享一下: 接受的: Reviewer #1: authors reported a seed-mediated growth of Pt nanoparticles with tunable shapes and sizes using organometallic precusor. Although various growth mechanisms on the morphology control of Pt nanoparticles have been reported previously, especially from Dr. Younan Xia and Dr. Hong Yang's groups, respectively, the proposed competetive growth between <111> and <100> facets discussed with respect to the precursor concentration and deposition surface area was rather interesting. Authors also conducted the electrochemical measurements on ethanol oxidation fuel cell anodic reaction. However, the comparison with commerical (ETEK) catalyst was not presented, even it had been mentioned in the experimental section. A few more comments: 1. Author need to polish the introduction and/or conclusion parts to show the big picture of the work, and more important, the different from previous results. 2. several details need to been taken care of. For example, ETEK data mentioned above; methanol concetrantion was 0.5 M in the experimental part, but 0.1 M in the discussion part; reference potential sometime indicated as Ag/AgCl, sometimes as SCE. 3. one more suggestion, author shouldn't present the simulated figures in the top row of scheme 1: unless there was direct support from TEM, it's too obscue to conclude the exact stuctures, especially for the multipods. Reviewer #2: In this manuscript the authors employed a seed-mediated solvothermal procedure for the preparation of platinum nanoparticles. They adjusted several reaction parameters including the platinum precursor to seed molar ratio (PPS), the precursor addition rate and the seed size, and investigated their effects on the final product. They were able to give a reasonable explanation on the experimental results based on reaction thermodynamics and kinetics. They also tried to understand the growth process using a semi-quantified number of platinum precursor concentration to nanoparticle surface area ratio (c/s). Although the innovative insights of this manuscript are just moderate as most of their observations and arguments have been proposed in previous publications, overall I think it is a decent research article as the subject itself can bring a wide scientific interest to readers. Their systematic study and substantial data can potentially provide some useful clues in the exploration of new platinum nanomaterials. I would like to recommend it for publication in the Journal of Colloid and Interface Science after a major revision and the following questions being addressed. 1. The authors suggested an anisotropic growth mechanism for the formation of branched platinum nanoparticles when the PPS value was high. However this mechanism is more often applied in understanding anisotropic growth of materials with dramatic anisotropy in different facets, such as oxides and selenides. It is known that additional nucleation by platinum precursor itself can occur when PPS is rather high (Nano Res. 2009, 2, 406-415), and branched nanostructures can form via oriented attachment among primary nanoparticles (Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013-1020). It is not very convincing to exclude this possible mechanism without any experimental evidence. More experiments are suggested to justify their argument. For example, TEM study of the products collected after a short reaction time can tell whether there is additional nucleation and the products collected after different reaction time can provide a direct evidence of the growth process. A careful HR-TEM observation of the branched platinum nanoparticles will also be helpful in distinguishing these two mechanisms, as the oriented attachment can not avoid formation of twin planes while an anisotropic growth usually leads to single crystalline structures (ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1501-1510; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4590-4591). 2. The definition of PPS (the molar ratio of Pt(acac)2/seed) is a little bit amphibolous to readers. It will be helpful if the authors can make a more clear definition. Do the moles of seed stand for the quantity of platinum nanoparticles or platinum metal? How did the authors determine the moles of platinum nanoparticles in the experiments if the molar number stands for the first one? 3. The PPS numbers in Figure 3, 5 and 6 and their captions should be N rather than 1:N based on their definition. 4. I am confused with the concentration of methanol in their electrochemical tests. They mentioned 0.5 M in the "Materials and methods" part while 0.1 M in Figure 5. The authors should have a double check with this number. 5. Labeling 1a and 1b should be exchanged in the caption of Figure 6 from context. 6. The authors should cite proper references to support their arguments. For example, reference [84] on page 13 has nothing with methanol oxidation reaction thus cannot support their sentences "In all cases, the voltammetric features are consistent with previous literature [84], .". References are needed to support their argument on page 11, "Once introducing excess precursor, the growth along <111> faces is highly accelerated, generating branched NPs". 7. Wording of the manuscript needs further polishing. There are quite a few misuses of words and grammar in the text. |
106楼2013-10-21 20:55:35
★ ★ ★
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
magicb: 金币+2, 非常不错的建议 2013-10-23 10:34:06
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
magicb: 金币+2, 非常不错的建议 2013-10-23 10:34:06
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
30楼2013-10-21 15:17:53
4楼2013-10-21 14:24:54
12楼2013-10-21 14:48:58
21楼2013-10-21 15:01:28
22楼2013-10-21 15:02:37
29楼2013-10-21 15:13:46
47楼2013-10-21 15:36:01
简单回复
haixiawu2楼
2013-10-21 14:20
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sjmr12213楼
2013-10-21 14:24
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
杰克小龙5楼
2013-10-21 14:27
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
求不重复6楼
2013-10-21 14:28
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ansonal7楼
2013-10-21 14:28
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
裤兜有烟8楼
2013-10-21 14:29
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-10-21 14:32
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
杀神暗狼10楼
2013-10-21 14:38
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
virologik11楼
2013-10-21 14:39
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
jh838113楼
2013-10-21 14:49
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
阿桂金14楼
2013-10-21 14:50
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gengxin6015楼
2013-10-21 14:52
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福!!!!
user5988816楼
2013-10-21 14:53
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
florahdu17楼
2013-10-21 14:54
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
落花剑雨18楼
2013-10-21 14:55
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
mvpyqz19楼
2013-10-21 14:55
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
! [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
chenyh71820楼
2013-10-21 14:59
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
icebergwu23楼
2013-10-21 15:04
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yaoyao14524楼
2013-10-21 15:05
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chentao25楼
2013-10-21 15:07
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lilyshuoxu26楼
2013-10-21 15:10
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhaoyan197827楼
2013-10-21 15:11
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与


天涯201228楼
2013-10-21 15:12
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
userhung31楼
2013-10-21 15:18
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空32楼
2013-10-21 15:19
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与

1594139166733楼
2013-10-21 15:22
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
springsunyj34楼
2013-10-21 15:22
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
miaojiabing35楼
2013-10-21 15:23
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
流水有情36楼
2013-10-21 15:24
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
neu23437楼
2013-10-21 15:25
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lzboy31538楼
2013-10-21 15:27
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ohcesc39楼
2013-10-21 15:28
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2011052540楼
2013-10-21 15:30
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
D
kiss2008553741楼
2013-10-21 15:30
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
rainrain42楼
2013-10-21 15:33
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
交大狂人43楼
2013-10-21 15:34
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhiyongwang44楼
2013-10-21 15:34
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Spinage45楼
2013-10-21 15:35
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶
哦吧港南厮打46楼
2013-10-21 15:35
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
ts_chenchao48楼
2013-10-21 15:38
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gongxd32549楼
2013-10-21 15:38
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
cathy198822950楼
2013-10-21 15:39
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与














回复此楼
liguan525