| 查看: 9172 | 回复: 128 | ||||
[交流]
每次写审稿意见都发愁,有没有虫友愿意分享自己的SCI论文审稿意见?
|
||||
| 经常要给一些英文论文写审稿意见,农学,作物科学相关的,或者生物类的,希望虫友们友情分享一下自己的审稿意见,给我参考一下吧,英文的哦,非常感谢! |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
宝贵经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
308求调剂
已经有4人回复
NSFC申报书里申请人简历中代表性论著还需要在申报书最后的附件里面再上传一遍吗
已经有14人回复
材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐
已经有6人回复
化学调剂0703
已经有7人回复
327求调剂
已经有11人回复
调剂
已经有8人回复
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有7人回复
伙伴们,祝我生日快乐吧
已经有24人回复
中科院材料273求调剂
已经有3人回复
材料工程专硕274一志愿211求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
这样的审稿意见如何回复
已经有5人回复
被一SCI期刊邀请当作审稿人了,我的论文还在Under Review
已经有11人回复
本人第一篇SCI文章,求如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有5人回复
请问综述性的中文文章怎么审稿?如何写审稿意见?
已经有5人回复
投稿SCI,审稿意见求助
已经有8人回复
SCI编辑一定会找自己推荐的审稿人吗
已经有22人回复
刚收到SCI期刊的审稿意见,如何回答审稿人?
已经有23人回复
sci如何回复审稿意见,尤其是改格式的审稿意见?
已经有8人回复
投SCI外刊,如何回复审稿意见,谢谢!!!
已经有6人回复
SCI审稿意见回来了,编辑给的moderate revision,麻烦大家帮分析一下,有BB
已经有28人回复
怎么回复中文期刊的审稿意见,有没有模板啊?
已经有4人回复
求SCI文章审稿人二审意见
已经有24人回复
投稿SCI期刊(小修),编辑给的意见,有经验的虫友们给出出主意啊!
已经有15人回复
会议论文同意接收后,怎么对待审稿意见?
已经有9人回复
SCI投稿审稿人意见是这样的怎么回复?
已经有9人回复
SCI审稿有审稿费吗
已经有16人回复
SCI文章审稿人意见回来,却不知如何答复,请各位前辈指点
已经有7人回复
第一次投sci的审稿意见,小虫请教~
已经有14人回复
我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
冷冻行星球磨机、低温高温球磨机
+1/86
物理学 调剂
+1/86
重庆医科大学神经科学中心/病生与生理系诚邀海内外优秀博士加盟博士后队伍(长期)
+1/84
招收苏州国家实验室和苏州大学联合培养博士(2026年9月入学)
+1/82
太原理工大学博士招生 电池负极材料 固态电解质方向 有工作经验者优先
+1/79
加拿大阿尔伯塔大学招收电磁、无线通信、机器学习方向全奖硕士/博士/博士后/访问学者
+1/57
华南师范大学(211)博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+2/54
南开大学罗景山教授课题组招聘博士后(光/电催化、钙钛矿光伏方向)
+2/34
中科院化学所 宋延林 课题组招聘合成化学方向博士后(开展打印合成化学方向研究)
+1/32
新疆大学招收学硕调剂
+1/24
诚聘助理研究员 - 物理/材料/机械相关专业博士
+2/22
中国科学院苏州纳米所院士团队博士后岗位招聘
+1/15
2026年上海大学王亮课题组招收电催化或光催化研究背景的博士生
+2/14
南京林业大学有机功能分子实验室博士生招生启事
+1/8
中国民航飞行学院先进连接团队招收航空宇航、航空机械专业硕士研究生(学硕专硕均可)
+1/8
【第三轮招生】澳科大诚招2026年秋季硕士研究生(3月31日下午18:00截止)
+1/4
求推荐性价比好用的球磨罐
+1/4
2026年东北石油大学“页岩油气钻采高效井眼清洁”创新团队招硕士生
+1/3
湖南大学2026博士招生-人工智能安全方向
+1/2
徐工-环境工程学院-招收调剂硕士
+1/1
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
我的给你分享一下: 接受的: Reviewer #1: authors reported a seed-mediated growth of Pt nanoparticles with tunable shapes and sizes using organometallic precusor. Although various growth mechanisms on the morphology control of Pt nanoparticles have been reported previously, especially from Dr. Younan Xia and Dr. Hong Yang's groups, respectively, the proposed competetive growth between <111> and <100> facets discussed with respect to the precursor concentration and deposition surface area was rather interesting. Authors also conducted the electrochemical measurements on ethanol oxidation fuel cell anodic reaction. However, the comparison with commerical (ETEK) catalyst was not presented, even it had been mentioned in the experimental section. A few more comments: 1. Author need to polish the introduction and/or conclusion parts to show the big picture of the work, and more important, the different from previous results. 2. several details need to been taken care of. For example, ETEK data mentioned above; methanol concetrantion was 0.5 M in the experimental part, but 0.1 M in the discussion part; reference potential sometime indicated as Ag/AgCl, sometimes as SCE. 3. one more suggestion, author shouldn't present the simulated figures in the top row of scheme 1: unless there was direct support from TEM, it's too obscue to conclude the exact stuctures, especially for the multipods. Reviewer #2: In this manuscript the authors employed a seed-mediated solvothermal procedure for the preparation of platinum nanoparticles. They adjusted several reaction parameters including the platinum precursor to seed molar ratio (PPS), the precursor addition rate and the seed size, and investigated their effects on the final product. They were able to give a reasonable explanation on the experimental results based on reaction thermodynamics and kinetics. They also tried to understand the growth process using a semi-quantified number of platinum precursor concentration to nanoparticle surface area ratio (c/s). Although the innovative insights of this manuscript are just moderate as most of their observations and arguments have been proposed in previous publications, overall I think it is a decent research article as the subject itself can bring a wide scientific interest to readers. Their systematic study and substantial data can potentially provide some useful clues in the exploration of new platinum nanomaterials. I would like to recommend it for publication in the Journal of Colloid and Interface Science after a major revision and the following questions being addressed. 1. The authors suggested an anisotropic growth mechanism for the formation of branched platinum nanoparticles when the PPS value was high. However this mechanism is more often applied in understanding anisotropic growth of materials with dramatic anisotropy in different facets, such as oxides and selenides. It is known that additional nucleation by platinum precursor itself can occur when PPS is rather high (Nano Res. 2009, 2, 406-415), and branched nanostructures can form via oriented attachment among primary nanoparticles (Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1013-1020). It is not very convincing to exclude this possible mechanism without any experimental evidence. More experiments are suggested to justify their argument. For example, TEM study of the products collected after a short reaction time can tell whether there is additional nucleation and the products collected after different reaction time can provide a direct evidence of the growth process. A careful HR-TEM observation of the branched platinum nanoparticles will also be helpful in distinguishing these two mechanisms, as the oriented attachment can not avoid formation of twin planes while an anisotropic growth usually leads to single crystalline structures (ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1501-1510; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4590-4591). 2. The definition of PPS (the molar ratio of Pt(acac)2/seed) is a little bit amphibolous to readers. It will be helpful if the authors can make a more clear definition. Do the moles of seed stand for the quantity of platinum nanoparticles or platinum metal? How did the authors determine the moles of platinum nanoparticles in the experiments if the molar number stands for the first one? 3. The PPS numbers in Figure 3, 5 and 6 and their captions should be N rather than 1:N based on their definition. 4. I am confused with the concentration of methanol in their electrochemical tests. They mentioned 0.5 M in the "Materials and methods" part while 0.1 M in Figure 5. The authors should have a double check with this number. 5. Labeling 1a and 1b should be exchanged in the caption of Figure 6 from context. 6. The authors should cite proper references to support their arguments. For example, reference [84] on page 13 has nothing with methanol oxidation reaction thus cannot support their sentences "In all cases, the voltammetric features are consistent with previous literature [84], .". References are needed to support their argument on page 11, "Once introducing excess precursor, the growth along <111> faces is highly accelerated, generating branched NPs". 7. Wording of the manuscript needs further polishing. There are quite a few misuses of words and grammar in the text. |
106楼2013-10-21 20:55:35
★ ★ ★
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
magicb: 金币+2, 非常不错的建议 2013-10-23 10:34:06
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
magicb: 金币+2, 非常不错的建议 2013-10-23 10:34:06
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
30楼2013-10-21 15:17:53
4楼2013-10-21 14:24:54
12楼2013-10-21 14:48:58
21楼2013-10-21 15:01:28
22楼2013-10-21 15:02:37
29楼2013-10-21 15:13:46
47楼2013-10-21 15:36:01
简单回复
haixiawu2楼
2013-10-21 14:20
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sjmr12213楼
2013-10-21 14:24
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
杰克小龙5楼
2013-10-21 14:27
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
求不重复6楼
2013-10-21 14:28
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ansonal7楼
2013-10-21 14:28
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
裤兜有烟8楼
2013-10-21 14:29
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-10-21 14:32
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
杀神暗狼10楼
2013-10-21 14:38
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
virologik11楼
2013-10-21 14:39
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
jh838113楼
2013-10-21 14:49
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
阿桂金14楼
2013-10-21 14:50
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gengxin6015楼
2013-10-21 14:52
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福!!!!
user5988816楼
2013-10-21 14:53
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
florahdu17楼
2013-10-21 14:54
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
落花剑雨18楼
2013-10-21 14:55
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
mvpyqz19楼
2013-10-21 14:55
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
! [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
chenyh71820楼
2013-10-21 14:59
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
icebergwu23楼
2013-10-21 15:04
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yaoyao14524楼
2013-10-21 15:05
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chentao25楼
2013-10-21 15:07
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lilyshuoxu26楼
2013-10-21 15:10
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhaoyan197827楼
2013-10-21 15:11
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与


天涯201228楼
2013-10-21 15:12
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
userhung31楼
2013-10-21 15:18
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空32楼
2013-10-21 15:19
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与

1594139166733楼
2013-10-21 15:22
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
springsunyj34楼
2013-10-21 15:22
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
miaojiabing35楼
2013-10-21 15:23
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
流水有情36楼
2013-10-21 15:24
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
neu23437楼
2013-10-21 15:25
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lzboy31538楼
2013-10-21 15:27
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ohcesc39楼
2013-10-21 15:28
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2011052540楼
2013-10-21 15:30
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
D
kiss2008553741楼
2013-10-21 15:30
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
rainrain42楼
2013-10-21 15:33
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
交大狂人43楼
2013-10-21 15:34
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhiyongwang44楼
2013-10-21 15:34
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Spinage45楼
2013-10-21 15:35
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶
哦吧港南厮打46楼
2013-10-21 15:35
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
ts_chenchao48楼
2013-10-21 15:38
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gongxd32549楼
2013-10-21 15:38
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与
cathy198822950楼
2013-10-21 15:39
回复
liguan525(金币+1): 谢谢参与













回复此楼
liguan525