24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

leiws

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

木虫浪子

应助: 327 (大学生)
金币: 20393
散金: 1872
红花: 62
帖子: 3922
在线: 2135.5小时
虫号: 832300
注册: 2009-08-22
性别: GG
专业: 催化化学

[交流] 这个年头，作图要谨慎...后果很严重～～～已有2人参与

因为ACS期刊最近这个月频频的出问题...数据造假什么的...有机出问题一篇，纳米出问题一篇...ACS的相关期刊主编现在处于舆论的中心～
有机部分事件回顾：
   A recently published ASAP article in the journal Organometallics is sure to raise some eyebrows in the chemical community. While the paper itself is a straightforward study of palladium and platinum bis-sulfoxide complexes, page 12 of the corresponding Supporting Information file contains what appears to be an editorial note that was inadvertently left in the published document:
“Emma, please insert NMR data here! where are they? and for this compound, just make up an elemental analysis…”
   This statement goes beyond a simple embarrassing failure to properly edit the manuscript, as it appears the first author is being instructed to fabricate data. Elemental analyses would be very easy to fabricate, and long-time readers of this blog will recall how fake elemental analyses were pivotal to Bengu Sezen’s campaign of fraud in the work she published from 2002 to 2005 out of Dalibor Sames’ lab at Columbia.
   The compound labeled 14 (an acac complex) in the main paper does not appear to correspond to compound 14 in the SI. In fact, the bridged-dichloride compound appears to be listed an as unlabeled intermediate in Scheme 5, which should raise more eyebrows. Did the authors unlist the compound in order to avoid having to provide robust characterization for it?
纳米原帖出处：
http://www.chemistry-blog.com/20 ... om-the-pease-group/
有机造假文件出处：
http://blog.chembark.com/2013/08 ... t-si-file/#comments
个人觉得：
纳米的那哥们PS的图比较可爱...还带阴影的
有机部分的回复亮瞎了...尤其是那句“make up”...
一起来谈谈那些年我们见过的各式各样的论文舞弊行为～～～

[ Last edited by leiws on 2013-8-21 at 15:57 ]

回复此楼