| 查看: 1504 | 回复: 2 | ||||
[交流]
这个年头,作图要谨慎...后果很严重~~~ 已有2人参与
|
|
因为ACS期刊最近这个月频频的出问题...数据造假什么的...有机出问题一篇,纳米出问题一篇...ACS的相关期刊主编现在处于舆论的中心~ 有机部分事件回顾: A recently published ASAP article in the journal Organometallics is sure to raise some eyebrows in the chemical community. While the paper itself is a straightforward study of palladium and platinum bis-sulfoxide complexes, page 12 of the corresponding Supporting Information file contains what appears to be an editorial note that was inadvertently left in the published document: “Emma, please insert NMR data here! where are they? and for this compound, just make up an elemental analysis…” This statement goes beyond a simple embarrassing failure to properly edit the manuscript, as it appears the first author is being instructed to fabricate data. Elemental analyses would be very easy to fabricate, and long-time readers of this blog will recall how fake elemental analyses were pivotal to Bengu Sezen’s campaign of fraud in the work she published from 2002 to 2005 out of Dalibor Sames’ lab at Columbia. The compound labeled 14 (an acac complex) in the main paper does not appear to correspond to compound 14 in the SI. In fact, the bridged-dichloride compound appears to be listed an as unlabeled intermediate in Scheme 5, which should raise more eyebrows. Did the authors unlist the compound in order to avoid having to provide robust characterization for it? 纳米原帖出处: http://www.chemistry-blog.com/20 ... om-the-pease-group/ 有机造假文件出处: http://blog.chembark.com/2013/08 ... t-si-file/#comments 个人觉得: 纳米的那哥们PS的图比较可爱...还带阴影的 有机部分的回复亮瞎了...尤其是那句“make up”... 一起来谈谈那些年我们见过的各式各样的论文舞弊行为~~~ [ Last edited by leiws on 2013-8-21 at 15:57 ] |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
有用的资源-huashuhuai |
» 猜你喜欢
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分?
已经有12人回复
2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B?
已经有4人回复
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有29人回复
奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有9人回复
是这周出结果还是下周出结果?
已经有3人回复
小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊
已经有9人回复
有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验)
已经有4人回复
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有13人回复
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有7人回复
读博的好处
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

2楼2013-08-21 17:31:59
3楼2013-08-24 22:57:08










回复此楼

100