24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1957  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

nomove

新虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 几乎同一天,两篇稿子被拒。 已有11人参与

1、Although this study may affirm or expand on available literature, we do not feel that the paper contains sufficient new or novel information to assign a high enough priority in this area, as required for full review.

2、If you look at the Journal guidelines on the web or browse some recent issues, you will see that we are interested in the methodological aspects of medical and health research.   While your paper does talk about some important methodological issues, the methods you describe are fairly simple and your approach is based on simulation, which is difficult to generalize.  Some of the statements you make regarding the commonly used approaches to treatment allocation seem naive as well.  There has been a great deal written on this topic in recent years.   From a presentation perspective, there are also some issues with your paper.  For example, the logical flow is awkward in places and there are a number of typos in your paper.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lgghyboss

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
建议楼主对调下杂志投稿试试~兄弟也只能帮你到这里了~
如果时间可以估价,我愿意做一名岁月估价师。
5楼2013-07-30 22:22:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

夜色正浓

木虫 (知名作家)

超级版主


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
首先论文没创新,没做实验,而且写得也很糟糕,加油吧
没有个性,不签名。
2楼2013-07-30 19:58:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

junzy

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
改改投其他刊物吧,不要吊死在一棵树上。
3楼2013-07-30 21:45:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

雪松下的记忆

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我是两篇轮流被拒
前后被拒5,6次了。。。
还好有一篇送出去审了,今天看状态貌似审稿意见都回到编辑那里了,祈祷中
4楼2013-07-30 22:21:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见