24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1961  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

nomove

新虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 几乎同一天,两篇稿子被拒。 已有11人参与

1、Although this study may affirm or expand on available literature, we do not feel that the paper contains sufficient new or novel information to assign a high enough priority in this area, as required for full review.

2、If you look at the Journal guidelines on the web or browse some recent issues, you will see that we are interested in the methodological aspects of medical and health research.   While your paper does talk about some important methodological issues, the methods you describe are fairly simple and your approach is based on simulation, which is difficult to generalize.  Some of the statements you make regarding the commonly used approaches to treatment allocation seem naive as well.  There has been a great deal written on this topic in recent years.   From a presentation perspective, there are also some issues with your paper.  For example, the logical flow is awkward in places and there are a number of typos in your paper.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

1990杨小平

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
不要灰心,继续加油哦!
9楼2013-07-31 15:58:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 nomove 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见