24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 520  |  回复: 1

梦天使2013

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 翻译一段话,谢啦各位

There appears to be some room for
manoeuvre in the legislation with regard
to the interpretation of ‘‘good clinical
practice.’’ Instead of accepting each new
layer of bureaucracy the academic com-munity should clarify these developments,
using legal advice where necessary. The
cost-effectiveness of the type of procedures
that ICH GCP generates is untested. For
example, it has been estimated that the
cost of a single ‘‘data query’’ is US$150.
Robert Califf notes that this is a ‘‘colossal
waste of money,’’ and that a more effective
and scientific method would be to use
sampling and the statistical process control
techniques that are found in other indus-tries (such as engineering and manufac-turing) [41]. In short, there is no evidence
that the intense bureaucracy of centralised
politically driven procedures for ICH GCP has improved the care of trial participants
in any way
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cean

金虫 (职业作家)

屌绳一条

【答案】应助回帖

There appears to be some room for
manoeuvre in the legislation with regard
to the interpretation of ‘‘good clinical
practice.’’
对“临床实践指南”的解释,在法规上有一定的操作空间。
To do great work, you have to have a pure mind.
2楼2013-08-11 20:41:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 梦天使2013 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见