| 查看: 561 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
翻译一段话，谢啦各位
|
|
There appears to be some room for manoeuvre in the legislation with regard to the interpretation of ‘‘good clinical practice.’’ Instead of accepting each new layer of bureaucracy the academic com-munity should clarify these developments, using legal advice where necessary. The cost-effectiveness of the type of procedures that ICH GCP generates is untested. For example, it has been estimated that the cost of a single ‘‘data query’’ is US$150. Robert Califf notes that this is a ‘‘colossal waste of money,’’ and that a more effective and scientific method would be to use sampling and the statistical process control techniques that are found in other indus-tries (such as engineering and manufac-turing) [41]. In short, there is no evidence that the intense bureaucracy of centralised politically driven procedures for ICH GCP has improved the care of trial participants in any way |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上本子正文33页，违规吗？会被低分嘛？
已经有10人回复
-
国自然上会要求
已经有9人回复
-
博士申请
已经有5人回复
-
评审有感
已经有6人回复
-
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有16人回复
-
上海大学实验技术岗位非升即走
已经有8人回复
-
考博自荐
已经有6人回复
-
青C资助名额大幅增加！
已经有16人回复
-
重磅！青年科学基金项目（C类）资助增幅预计超过50%
已经有10人回复
-
我在等一个没有答案的答案
已经有3人回复
2楼2013-08-11 20:41:24
20