| 查看: 577 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
翻译一段话，谢啦各位
|
|
There appears to be some room for manoeuvre in the legislation with regard to the interpretation of ‘‘good clinical practice.’’ Instead of accepting each new layer of bureaucracy the academic com-munity should clarify these developments, using legal advice where necessary. The cost-effectiveness of the type of procedures that ICH GCP generates is untested. For example, it has been estimated that the cost of a single ‘‘data query’’ is US$150. Robert Califf notes that this is a ‘‘colossal waste of money,’’ and that a more effective and scientific method would be to use sampling and the statistical process control techniques that are found in other indus-tries (such as engineering and manufac-turing) [41]. In short, there is no evidence that the intense bureaucracy of centralised politically driven procedures for ICH GCP has improved the care of trial participants in any way |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
重庆理工大学副校长遇刺身亡 传涉案副教授疑因积怨行凶
已经有7人回复
-
[急招]吉林大学招收26年9月入学考核制博士生1名，截止今晚24点前
已经有3人回复
-
前几天时间戳更新了
已经有13人回复
-
AASSDDFF
已经有3人回复
-
→_→
已经有3人回复
-
面上项目没有好文章就没希望了吗？
已经有20人回复
-
还有课题组有博士名额吗
已经有6人回复
-
博士申请
已经有3人回复
2楼2013-08-11 20:41:24