| 查看: 550 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
翻译一段话，谢啦各位
|
|
There appears to be some room for manoeuvre in the legislation with regard to the interpretation of ‘‘good clinical practice.’’ Instead of accepting each new layer of bureaucracy the academic com-munity should clarify these developments, using legal advice where necessary. The cost-effectiveness of the type of procedures that ICH GCP generates is untested. For example, it has been estimated that the cost of a single ‘‘data query’’ is US$150. Robert Califf notes that this is a ‘‘colossal waste of money,’’ and that a more effective and scientific method would be to use sampling and the statistical process control techniques that are found in other indus-tries (such as engineering and manufac-turing) [41]. In short, there is no evidence that the intense bureaucracy of centralised politically driven procedures for ICH GCP has improved the care of trial participants in any way |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
-
考博
已经有4人回复
-
药化及相关博士的申请
已经有3人回复
-
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活
已经有4人回复
-
一个化合物的合成路线：CAS:367929-02-0 名称：8β-乙烯基雌二醇
已经有4人回复
-
太白金星有点烦
已经有3人回复
-
中国地质大学（北京）博士招生补录，数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业
已经有3人回复
-
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评
已经有3人回复
-
有没有快的中文核心比较快录用的，纳米材料光催化
已经有4人回复
2楼2013-08-11 20:41:24