| ²é¿´: 3115 | »Ø¸´: 5 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
yush087гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ºË´ÅÐÅÔë±È
|
||
| ºË´ÅÐÅÔë±ÈÔõô¼ÆË㣿ÈçºÎ¸ü׼ȷµÄ¼ÆË㣿 |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
NMR&MRI |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0856£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á£¬¸÷λÀÏʦ¿´¿´ÎÒ£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
266·Ö£¬Çó²ÄÁÏÒ±½ðÄÜÔ´»¯¹¤µÈµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÕÅ·¼Ãú-Öйúũҵ´óѧ-»·¾³¹¤³Ìר˶-298
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
086000µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
320·Ö£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Òµ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
295²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¸ßθßѹ·´Ó¦ÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
6Â¥2016-08-03 16:02:39
cjzhu
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 390 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 3146.6
- ºì»¨: 88
- Ìû×Ó: 1966
- ÔÚÏß: 3265.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 727004
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-20
- רҵ: ºË´Å
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
| ²¼Â³¿ËµÄºË´ÅÒÇÓÐsinoÃüÁî¿ÉÒԲⶨÐÅÔë±È£¬¾ßÌ幫ʽ¿ÉÒÔ help sino ²é¿´¸ÃÃüÁîµÄ°ïÖúÎļþ¡£ |
2Â¥2013-07-20 10:17:31
boringboring
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 24.3
- Ìû×Ó: 21
- ÔÚÏß: 4.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2554964
- ×¢²á: 2013-07-20
- רҵ: ²¨Æ×·ÖÎöÓë³ÉÏñ·ÖÎö
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
In theory, signal-to-noise ratio S/N can be done in the following way. Process your spectrum, well phase it and correct the baseline. Locate the strongest peak, integrate over it, (say 0.1 ppm depending the peak width) and the integration is the signal. Now, randomly integrate over N noise regions (i.e., the non-peak regions) of 0.1 ppm wide. The average integration is the noise. signal/noise = S/N Some folks like to figure out S/N using peak height of the strongest peak and the height of the noise regions. They will run into argument of peak-to-peak or root-mean-square noise heights. |
3Â¥2013-07-26 04:37:12
suruiqin
°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 195 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.84
- ½ð±Ò: 6267
- É¢½ð: 20242
- ºì»¨: 151
- ɳ·¢: 162
- Ìû×Ó: 8368
- ÔÚÏß: 910.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1875887
- ×¢²á: 2012-07-02
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: É«Æ×·ÖÎö
- ¹ÜϽ: ·ÖÎö

4Â¥2013-07-26 09:58:51














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥