24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4198)
>导师招生 (349)
>休闲灌水 (182)
>虫友互识 (152)
>招聘信息布告栏 (145)
>文献求助 (122)
>论文道贺祈福 (115)
>硕博家园 (106)
>考研 (64)
>找工作 (49)
>考博 (47)
>博后之家 (46)
>基金申请 (43)
>生物科学 (29)
>教师之家 (25)
>论文投稿 (22)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 549.1
散金: 100
帖子: 149
在线: 55.8小时
虫号: 1877666
注册: 2012-07-03
专业: 空间物理

[求助] 急，大家看看我这审稿意见有戏吗？？

投的TGRS，下面是审稿意见：
Associate Editor Comments:

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers. Both state that the mansucript has sufficient potential for a future publication in TGRS. There were, however, several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation which should be addressed and amended in accordance to the reviewer suggestions. Such a revised manuscript will also improve both the relevance and readability for a wider audience.

--

Reviewers Comments:

Reviewer 1:

Please see comments in attached file (review1.pdf).

--

Reviewer 2:

Section 2 lacks novelty, the work has been done before in the references provided and
elsewhere, but this can be justified as part of a review.

Equation (17) and following: The author shold note that these assume that the
irregularites are infinitely elongated along the y-axis and therefore represent equatorial scintillation only.

Text just above equation (20): Strictly speaking, within context, there is no need to
assume that the drift velocity is zero, since, if the frozen-in assumption is made, this
can just be added to the scanning velocity during the aperture period.

English:
The English in this paper is good enough to be understood technically, but could be
improved for publication. Note that on p7, above eqn 20, thw word "dose" instead of "does" should be corrected.

感觉是有戏，但是我我的帐号是Major Revision 要大修啊！第一个审稿人给的意见也不多。这是什么情况？？请大神帮我分析分析！！！

回复此楼