应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 论文写作 » International Journal of Food Science and Technology返回意见了，大家帮忙看看吧
51/1返回列表
查看: 2170  |  回复: 14
查看全部回帖@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

水冰月1

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] International Journal of Food Science and Technology返回意见了，大家帮忙看看吧

The reviewer(s) have recommended major revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. To bring your manuscript to a state of acceptability you must respond to each of the reviewer's comments and either alter your manuscript as requested or state why you consider the suggestion inappropriate. Please be aware that your response and revisions do NOT guarantee eventual acceptance of your manuscript. Please ensure that you return your revised text within on month of the date of this e-mail.
Referee 1 Comments to the Author:

I do not see any novelty in the results presented. Hence I do not recommend the publication of this paper.

In the present study the authors report the stability of sucrose in methyl esters of selected fatty acids in the presence or absence of added surfactants. Thermal gravimetric analysis was used to study the stability of sugars used. The authors have worked out a protocol for making sucrose esters with better efficiency.
I find that the data is too preliminary to warrant its publication in the present form

Referee: 2
Comments to the Author
Overall the paper is well written but could be improved by having the language checked before submission either by a native speaker / person educated in the language or by professional consultants. There are areas, as things stand where either ambiguity or difficulty in catching the entire meaning occur.
The paper presents interestin findings which may be of great use in the industry of sucrose ester production in terms of process and product optimisation.
Below are a range of suggestions both linguistic and scientific that should be considered for revision. They appear in chronological order.

第二个审稿人提的意见感觉特别好，我都有点不好意思了。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2013-06-08 18:36:23
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水冰月1

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 不改我心 at 2013-06-09 01:14:33
敢问楼主多久给的返修意见呢？参考参考，也准备试试这个杂志，谢啦！

2个月给返修意见的，比较慢~
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2013-06-09 09:54:12
 已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水冰月1

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
11楼: Originally posted by 不改我心 at 2013-06-09 10:21:04
哦，两个月还好啦，谢谢楼主，看编辑的意思你认真改改文章，离被接收的日子不远啦！加油！...

恩那，你也加油！
回复此楼
12楼2013-06-09 14:55:17
 已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水冰月1

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
14楼: Originally posted by makunjida at 2013-06-09 16:14:20
楼主第一个人是拒稿的语气，我估计你不好改。

我会认真回复的~
赞一下 回复此楼
15楼2013-06-09 16:43:19
 已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 水冰月1 的主题更新
51/1返回列表
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭