24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

huluan87

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 418.1
红花: 1
帖子: 25
在线: 30.5小时
虫号: 1304601
注册: 2011-05-24
专业: 橡胶及弹性体

[求助] 大家看看编辑是个什么意思呢？想接受呢还是什么呢？

编辑：“I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript referenced above has been recommended for publication in New Journal of Chemistry, subject to revision according to the reports given at the end of this decision letter. ”

Referee: 1
Comments to the Author
Now that authors have adequately addressed the concerns raised, the revised manuscript can be accepted.

Referee: 2
Comments to the Author
The revised manuscript and response letter from the authors are merely repeating what they are trying to argue in the previous submission without tackling the important issues addressed by the reviewer. I suggest the manuscript should be rejected until the issues are fully resolved.

Referee: 3 (Adjudicator)
Comments to the Author
I have carefully gone over the revised manuscript. The overall rating is very good. However, there is only one problem I want to point out: rewrite the abstract part. The original abstract mentions too much about how to prepare the composite, which in my opinion is not necessary. The abstract part should more focused on the description of the new discovery and conclusion what the authors found and drew.

编辑态度不明，求大神指教

回复此楼