| 查看: 2131 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
herozhq0411银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
回信了，出现了很多错误，我是不是悲剧了
|
||
|
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有8人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有11人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有9人回复
-
2026年叶企孙基金
已经有6人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有13人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有9人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有11人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 2013届小硕找工作全过程，请有备而来。哈哈
已经有11人回复
- 联培申请的心历旅程与申请材料 [增加“行前篇” 2013-03-28]
已经有352人回复
- 中文文章返修后，自己发现了一个大问题。
已经有31人回复
- 喜剧&悲剧！三个多月后，居然回信同意我的申请！
已经有13人回复
herozhq0411
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 121.5
- 散金: 620
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 250
- 在线: 220.5小时
- 虫号: 2417619
- 注册: 2013-04-14
- 专业: 机械工程
|
Reviewer #1: Please see attachment for comments. Reviewer #2: It is recommended that the document be submitted for proofreading as there are plenty of grammatical as well as typographical errors. (e.g. Fig.1 vs. Figure 2; EC vs. E.C.; repetition of words occurs; spaces incorrect before comma; careless spelling mistakes e.g. galavnealed, softening, etc.). Sentences are poorly constructed. (e.g. "the", "a", "an" - often left out of sentences). Some sentence structures are difficult to understand. The wording does not reflect the meaning of the sentence i.e. "..manufactured safe accessory such as A, B and C pallor." What does this mean? Safety critical design sections such as A, B and C pillar in automotive design? Too many ideas are covered in one sentence. Heading of Table 1 can be shortened. Remove "used in this investigation". 我是第一次，好多都不懂，感谢您的指导~~ 这是审稿人的意见，但是审稿人#1的意见编辑没有发给我，我是不是写信要啊，多多指教，感谢ing |
7楼2013-05-10 22:30:09
2楼2013-05-10 21:22:16
Monash2011
专家顾问 (文坛精英)
-
专家经验: +222 - 应助: 757 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.03
- 金币: 33247.1
- 散金: 5054
- 红花: 40
- 帖子: 16655
- 在线: 1205.6小时
- 虫号: 1318869
- 注册: 2011-06-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2013-05-10 21:22:35
982121012
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 1237 (讲师)
- 金币: 16291.4
- 散金: 581
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 8132
- 在线: 4523小时
- 虫号: 832958
- 注册: 2009-08-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境分析化学
4楼2013-05-10 21:37:30
投票:
10