24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3459  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

blsun_010

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投PRL被婉拒,大家看这种情况适合申诉吗?

I make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your
work. In fact, as a practicing researcher in this field, I am very
impressed by the technical achievement of your work. It is not clear to me why
your manuscript would meet the PRL criteria of impact, innovation, and
interest. Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration
of the paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work
appears better suited for submittal to the latter. [Please see our
editorials http://prl.aps.org/edannounce/PRLv95i7.html (2005) and
http://prl.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.103.010001 (2009).]

I am willing to consider a resubmittal that clarifies the impact,
innovation, and interest of the work. If you would like me to
reevaluate the paper, I strongly suggest that you revise your
abstract, introduction, and conclusion, to make it clear to a general
reader why the paper meets our criteria. Jargon should be avoided as
much as possible.

If I am not persuaded that anonymous review is appropriate, I may
consult a Divisional Associate Editor on that question. If I find it
warranted, or the Divisional Associate Editor so recommends, I will
seek anonymous review.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文写作与投稿 Phys Rev Lett

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

blsun_010

铜虫 (初入文坛)

多谢各位大神
9楼2013-05-13 13:35:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

blsun_010

铜虫 (初入文坛)

因为貌似和其它通常的拒绝方式有点不同,所以问问各位大侠有没有什么建议
2楼2013-05-09 13:50:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

blsun_010

铜虫 (初入文坛)

各位虫友没有遇到过上面的情况吗?知道的给解答下啊,小弟不甚感激啊
3楼2013-05-10 10:49:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

十送红军

铜虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
你要做的不是申诉,而是按人家说的好好改改再投。
4楼2013-05-10 12:24:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见