| 查看: 2512 | 回复: 6 | ||||
[求助]
一审回复邮件，major revision的疑问？
|
|
本人投稿一篇SSCI，3月投的，一审还挺快，今天收到邮件，让我大修，大概看了两个审稿人的意见，一个审稿人几乎让我把方法的部分重写，很头疼...；另一个审稿人很友善，基本让我小修。。。 另外，责编后来加了一句话，如下： Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 这个是什么意思？是修改后再送审的几率很小吗？也就是说我大修之后很可能连二审的机会都很小，发表的几率就更小了？ 如果这样，我都不想改了，改投它刊算了？ 请各位童鞋给点意见啊，谢谢！   (附审稿意见) COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: There is no doubt that the paper will generate a good number of interesting and valuable implications to school management specifically on matters that relate to access and equity in education. To ensure that the paper assumes its merit in both substance and form, may I suggest that the following pointers be adequately addressed by the researchers. 1. While the introduction provides a succinct description of the current trends and issues raised by scholars in the field, I suggest that toward the end of it, the authors provide a paragraph that details the unique benefits that may accrue from the conduct of this scholarly and empirical investigation. Specifically, pinpoint the contributions of the paper to educational management practice and policy. 2. I strongly suggest that a section for the theoretical underpinning of the paper be provided. This is vital in justifying the main argument of the paper. 3. I also would like to suggest that a section on Literature Review and Hypotheses Development be substantially presented. Have a separate synthesis of relevant literature relative to the following variables: parental characteristics, family situation, school accessibility and educational quality. Toward the end of each review, highlight the argument that the research wishes to advance in the form of H1, H2, H3, H4... 4. Kindly rehash the methods section by having a clear-cut segmentation of the following: design, subjects and study site, data measures, data collection procedure, data analysis. 5. Separate the results from the discussion part. See to it that a substantial number of literature culled from ISI journals including the ones of TAPER be cross-referenced in the discussion section and provide also some bold attempt and implications to management practice and policy. 6. Kindly remove the doi information for references beyond 2012. This only applies for articles that are still in press. 7. Kindly have the paper edited by a native speaker of English. Looking forward to receiving the revised copy of this promising paper. Reviewer #2: 1. Abstract is concise and clear, however, the author needs to include the methodology (number of participants, data analysis….) in 1 or 2 short sentences describing how data is gathered and analyzed. 2. Basically, the results and arguments of the paper are well represented. What concerns me is that whether the merging of school is more efficient in the long run or is only a short-term solution. Could the suggested policy be applied to similar situations in other countries? Is SMR only an issue in China? The author needs to provide more information. 3. Does the survey include students' information, such as their performance and grades? Efficiency models can be developed using the existing school factors and students' information. 4. In sum, the study seems to be a fine study and has provided some important findings. However, the conclusion part of the paper should be tightened to indicate the major findings and highlight what the paper has achieved. [ Last edited by clara7368 on 2013-5-1 at 12:18 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有23人回复
-
求调剂院校信息
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工306
已经有4人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
328求调剂，英语六级551，有科研经历
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿北京化工大学070300 学硕336求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考！
已经有8人回复
-
资源与环境 调剂申请(333分)
已经有5人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
269专硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家一般对于major revision一般多久后提交返回稿？ JLT
已经有5人回复
- major revision提交后一直是with editor，希望大吗？
已经有10人回复
- 投了elsevier的一个期刊,要major revision,修改后接受的概率?
已经有16人回复
- 第三次major revision
已经有9人回复
- major revision 后多少天提交文章，有没有什么需要考虑的，谢谢！
已经有27人回复
- major revision 大家看有希望吗
已经有9人回复
- 麻烦大牛看一下我这个major revision该任何修改？
已经有8人回复
- Acta Materialia论文Major Revision Requiring Re-review的一些疑问。
已经有16人回复
- 请问minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么区分的？
已经有19人回复
- major revision完事后，几天能收到意见~
已经有23人回复
- major revision问题 求助
已经有5人回复
- 困惑~~ 只有一个比较细节的comments，编辑却给了我major revision
已经有3人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 获得Major revision，这样的主编与评审建议有机会吗？
已经有6人回复
- 有没有遭遇过两次Major Revision的？
已经有10人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- Major revision and reconsideration还有希望吗？
已经有5人回复
- major revision 后该怎么办？
已经有16人回复
|
顶 |
2楼2013-05-01 12:55:33
goslar
木虫 (职业作家)
我不再应助!
- 应助: 118 (高中生)
- 金币: 3592.7
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 3115
- 在线: 174.5小时
- 虫号: 1547023
- 注册: 2011-12-22
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 免疫生物学
3楼2013-05-01 12:58:03
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
clara7368: 金币+5, ★有帮助, 谢谢！ 2013-05-01 13:29:07
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
clara7368: 金币+5, ★有帮助, 谢谢！ 2013-05-01 13:29:07
|
Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 你修改的论文能否录用取决于你是否很好地解决了审稿人和编辑提出的问题。就是这个意思，挺正常的。 |
4楼2013-05-01 13:18:10
5楼2013-05-01 13:31:26
goslar
木虫 (职业作家)
我不再应助!
- 应助: 118 (高中生)
- 金币: 3592.7
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 3115
- 在线: 174.5小时
- 虫号: 1547023
- 注册: 2011-12-22
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 免疫生物学
clara73686楼2013-05-01 13:33:41
7楼2013-05-01 19:48:30
