| 查看: 1162 | 回复: 8 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
哟哟william木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
小段英文翻译,求助。各路大神速来呀!!!
|
|
|
To understand the reason for the superior electrochemical performance of the sulfur–carbon composite synthesized by the in situ sulfur-deposition route, EIS measurements were carried out with the coin cells. The Nyquist profiles of the pure sulfur and sulfur–carbon composite cathodes and the equivalent circuits are shown in Fig. 8. Re refers to the resistance of electrolyte, Rct refers to the charge transfer resistance between the interfaces of carbon/ sulfur/electrolyte, Wo refers to the Warburg impedance, and CPE refers to the constant phase element [23]. The resistance of electrolyte was estimated from the intersection of the front end of semicircles with the Z axis, which is similar for both the cathodes. The diameter of the impedance semicircles is related to the charge transfer resistance, which is a measure of the difficulty involved for charges crossing the boundary between the electrode and electrolyte. Before cycling, the sulfur–carbon composite cathode has a slightly lower charge transfer resistance value than the pure sulfur cathode, which is expected considering its higher first discharge capacity compared to that of the pure sulfur cathode. The close contact between the conductive carbon black and the insulating sulfur lowers the resistance for electrons transferring across the interface between them. In the subsequent cycles (1st, 25th, and 50th), the charge-transfer resistance of the pure sulfur cathode grows much larger than that found with the sulfur–carbon composite cathode. The main reason for this is the porous structure of the cycled pure sulfur cathode. Electrons passing across the boundary between conductive carbon and active material are impeded by the irreversible formation of the Li2S layer in the pores [10]. The EIS measurements thus reveal that the sulfur–carbon composite cathode exhibits better electronic conductivity and lithium-ion transport than the pure sulfur cathode due to the stable network structure of carbon black wrapping around the sulfur. The impedance of the sulfur–carbon composite after 50th cycles does not increase much, suggesting that the network structure maintains its integrity during the cycling process. |
» 本帖@通知
» 猜你喜欢
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站,青基依托单位怎么办?
已经有12人回复
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有5人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有28人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有7人回复
北核录用
已经有3人回复
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
磺酰氟产物,毕不了业了!
已经有8人回复

ruiyuan121
木虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 6
- 应助: 49 (小学生)
- 金币: 4842.1
- 散金: 633
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 1034
- 在线: 4035.5小时
- 虫号: 1133811
- 注册: 2010-10-28
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功

2楼2013-04-26 22:04:33
哟哟william
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1784.9
- 帖子: 205
- 在线: 69.2小时
- 虫号: 1254368
- 注册: 2011-04-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体与表面物理化学

3楼2013-04-26 22:05:21
ruiyuan121
木虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 6
- 应助: 49 (小学生)
- 金币: 4842.1
- 散金: 633
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 1034
- 在线: 4035.5小时
- 虫号: 1133811
- 注册: 2010-10-28
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功

4楼2013-04-26 22:11:12
哟哟william
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1784.9
- 帖子: 205
- 在线: 69.2小时
- 虫号: 1254368
- 注册: 2011-04-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体与表面物理化学

5楼2013-04-26 22:33:46
ruiyuan121
木虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 6
- 应助: 49 (小学生)
- 金币: 4842.1
- 散金: 633
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 1034
- 在线: 4035.5小时
- 虫号: 1133811
- 注册: 2010-10-28
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功

6楼2013-04-26 22:36:52
南京工大
木虫 (小有名气)
- 翻译EPI: 14
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1971.3
- 散金: 102
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 173
- 在线: 81.1小时
- 虫号: 1410020
- 注册: 2011-09-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子组装与超分子结构
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
哟哟william: 金币+10, 翻译EPI+1, ★有帮助 2013-04-26 22:42:55
哟哟william: 金币+10, 翻译EPI+1, ★有帮助 2013-04-26 22:42:55
| 为了更好的理解通过原位硫沉积法制备的硫-碳复合物电极具有良好电化学性能的原因,我们使用扣式电池进行了电化学阻抗谱的测试。图8中所表示的是纯的硫,硫碳复合物电极,以及对应电路的尼奎斯特图像。其中,Re代表电池液的电阻,Rct代表碳/硫/电池液界面间电荷转移的阻力,Wo代表瓦尔堡阻抗,CPE代表常相角元件。电池液以及阴极的电阻通过图线中半圆形曲线的前端与Z轴的交点确定。阻抗曲线的直径与电荷转移的阻力相关,通过该值可以测定电荷穿越电极和电池液界面的难易。在循环前,硫碳复合物电极的电荷传递阻力值略小于单纯硫电极,考虑到它与单纯硫电极相比较高的首次放电能力,这一点是可以理解的。导电炭黑与绝缘体硫的紧密接触减小了两者界面上电子传递的阻力。在后面的循环中(第一次,第25次,第50 次),单纯硫电极的电荷传递阻力增大程度要远大于硫碳复合物电极。单纯硫电极的多孔结构导致了这一现象的出现。电子在穿过导体碳和活性材料之间的界面时,被孔中不可逆生成的Li2S层阻碍。电化学阻抗谱的测试结果显示,硫碳复合物电极中,炭黑包裹在硫的表面生成稳定的网络结构,使其与单纯硫电极相比具有更好的电子传导性能以及锂离子传输性能。硫碳电极在50次循环后,阻抗并没有明显的增加,显示了其网络结构在循环过程中保持了很好的完整性。 |
7楼2013-04-26 22:40:46
哟哟william
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1784.9
- 帖子: 205
- 在线: 69.2小时
- 虫号: 1254368
- 注册: 2011-04-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体与表面物理化学

8楼2013-04-26 22:43:29
ruiyuan121
木虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 6
- 应助: 49 (小学生)
- 金币: 4842.1
- 散金: 633
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 1034
- 在线: 4035.5小时
- 虫号: 1133811
- 注册: 2010-10-28
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
哟哟william: 金币+40, ★★★★★最佳答案, 金币给你吧,呵呵,这么晚还帮我翻译,真是感谢你 2013-04-26 23:28:00
哟哟william: 金币+40, ★★★★★最佳答案, 金币给你吧,呵呵,这么晚还帮我翻译,真是感谢你 2013-04-26 23:28:00
|
To understand the reason for the superior electrochemical performance of the sulfur–carbon composite synthesized by the in situ sulfur-deposition route, EIS measurements were carried out with the coin cells. 通过对纽扣电池进行电化学阻抗分析,来了解原位硫沉积法合成的碳硫复合物为什么具有良好的电化学特性。 The Nyquist profiles of the pure sulfur and sulfur–carbon composite cathodes and the equivalent circuits are shown in Fig. 8. 纯硫阴极电极和碳硫复合阴极电极的 Nyquist剖面和等效电路如图8所示。 Re refers to the resistance of electrolyte, Rct refers to the charge transfer resistance between the interfaces of carbon/ sulfur/electrolyte, Wo refers to the Warburg impedance, and CPE refers to the constant phase element [23]. 其中,Re代表电解液的电阻,Rct代表碳/硫/电解液界面间电荷转移电阻,Wo代表瓦尔堡阻抗,CPE代表常相位角元件。 The resistance of electrolyte was estimated from the intersection of the front end ofsemicircles with the Z axis, which is similar for both the cathodes.与阴极电阻计算方法相似,电解液的电阻通过图线中半圆形曲线的前端与Z轴的交点确定。 The diameter of the impedance semicircles is related to the charge transfer resistance, which is a measure of the difficulty involved for charges crossing the boundary between the electrode and electrolyte.阻抗曲线的直径与电荷转移电阻有关,通过该值可以断定电荷穿越电极和电池液界面的难易程度。 Before cycling, the sulfur–carbon composite cathode has a slightly lower charge transfer resistance value than the pure sulfur cathode, which is expected considering its higher first discharge capacity compared to that of the pure sulfur cathode. 循环前,硫碳复合电极的电荷转移阻力值略小于纯硫电极,这是由于碳硫复合电极的首次放电容量比纯硫电极高。 The close contact between the conductive carbon black and the insulating sulfurlowers the resistance for electrons transferring across the interface between them. 导电炭黑与绝缘硫的紧密接触减小了两者界面间电子转移电阻。 In the subsequent cycles (1st, 25th, and 50th), the charge-transfer resistance of the pure sulfur cathode grows much larger than that found with the sulfur–carbon composite cathode.在随后的循环中(第1圈,第25圈,第50 圈),纯硫电极电荷转移电阻的增加程度要远大于碳硫复合物电极。 The main reason for this is the porous structure of the cycled pure sulfur cathode. 循环纯硫电极的多孔结构导致了这一现象的出现。 Electrons passing across the boundary between conductive carbon and active material are impeded by the irreversible formation of the Li2S layer in the pores [10]. 在孔内单向生产的硫化锂层阻碍了电子在导电碳和活性材料之间的转移。 The EIS measurements thus reveal that the sulfur–carbon composite cathode exhibits better electronic conductivity and lithium-ion transport than the puresulfur cathode due to the stable network structure of carbon black wrapping around the sulfur. 电化学阻抗谱的测试结果显示,由于碳硫复合电极具有碳包裹硫的稳定网状结构,它的电子导电性以及锂离子的转移要比纯硫电极好。 The impedance of the sulfur–carbon composite after 50th cycles does not increase much, suggesting that the network structure maintains its integrity during the cycling process. 在50圈循环后,碳硫复合电极的阻抗并没有明显增加,说明在循环过程中网状结构保持完整。 参考…… |

9楼2013-04-26 23:18:57












回复此楼
哟哟william