| ²é¿´: 2012 | »Ø¸´: 10 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
ÝæÔÂç÷ç÷½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
NBO¼ÆËãÖжþ¼¶Î¢ÈÆÄܵÄȡֵµÄÎÊÌâ
|
||
|
ÊäÈëÎļþÊÇ%chk=GDC65-11nboc.chk %mem=600MW %nproc=6 #p b3lyp/6-31+g(d,p) pop=nboread linux¼ÆËã½áÊø×ªµ½winϺó£¬ÎÊÌâÒ»£ºÔÚChemcraftµÄTools²Ëµ¥ÏÂÑ¡ÔñOrbitals/Render molecular orbitals¡£ÔÚ¡°Choose orbitals source¡±Öлá³öÏÖ¼¸ÖÖ¹ìµÀÀàÐÍ¡£ÎÒÃǹØÐĵÄÊÇNBO£¬¹ÊÑ¡µÚÒ»¸ö¡£ÎªÊ²Ã´ÎҵijöÏÖµÄÊÇCould not read orbitals from the file. ±¸×¢£ºÎÒÓÐFILE.31--FILE.41ÎļþµÄ¡£Ò²ÊÇÕý³£½áÊøµÄ¡£ ÎÊÌâ¶þ£º¿ÉÒÔÔÚChemcraftÏÂSourceÏÂÕÒµ½Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis of Fock Matrix in NBO Basis ¶þ½×΢ÈÅÄܵÄÊý¾Ý£¬ÎÒÏëÖªµÀµÄÊÇDonor NBO ºÍ Acceptor NBO µ½µ×È¡µÄÊÇÄĸöÄØ£¿ ¶ÔÓÚC6+ ÓëGDÀ´Ëµ £¬Ö÷ÒªÊÇC6+ÉϵÄC2-H6ÓëGDÉϵÄO35-H38Ö®¼ä´æÔÚÏ໥×÷ÓᣠÀí½â1£ºÈ¡µÄÊÇE(2)ÊýÖµ×î´óµÄ Àí½â2£ºÈ¡µÄÊÇÏ໥µÄ¼üµÄÄÜÁ¿Öµ£¬Õâ¸ö¹©µç×ÓÌá¿ÉÒÔÊÇBD,Ò²¿ÉÒÔÊÇLPµÄ°É£¿ Êä³öÊý¾ÝΪ£º Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis of Fock Matrix in NBO Basis E(2) Donor NBO (i) Acceptor NBO (j) kcal/mol within unit 1 1. BD ( 1) C 1 - C 2 BD*( 1) N 4 - C8 4.24 1.05 0.060 1. BD ( 1) C 1 - C 2 BD*( 1) N 12 - C13 4.36 1.05 0.061 2. BD ( 2) C1 - C 2 LP ( 1) N 12 219.73 0.02 0.0888 8. BD ( 2) C 3 - N 4 LP ( 1) N 12 21.77 0.10 0.073 124. LP ( 1) N 12 BD*( 2) C 1 - C 2 29.19 0.28 0.087 124. LP ( 1) N 12 BD*( 2) C 3 - N 4 83.29 0.21 0.120 from unit 1 to unit 2 5. BD ( 1) C 2 - H 6 BD*( 1) O35 - H38 49.29 1.13 0.211 from unit 2 to unit 1 44. BD ( 1) O 35 - H 38 BD*( 1) C 2 - H 6 3.12 1.22 0.055 44. BD ( 1) O 35 - H 38 BD*( 1) C 2 - N 12 5.23 1.17 0.070 127. LP ( 1) O 35 BD*( 1) C 2 - H 6 0.90 1.01 0.027 within unit 2 823. BD*( 2) C 26 - C 29 BD*( 2) C 32 - C 34 177.25 0.02 0.078 825. BD*( 2) C 28 - C 30 RY*( 3) C 28 2.72 0.55 0.076 825. BD*( 2) C 28 - C 30 RY*( 1) O 35 0.55 0.63 0.037 825. BD*( 2) C 28 - C 30 BD*( 2) C 26 - C 29 269.66 0.01 0.079 825. BD*( 2) C 28 - C 30 BD*( 2) C 32 - C 34 117.41 0.03 0.083 ¶ÔÓÚC6+ ÓëGDÀ´Ëµ £¬Ö÷ÒªÊÇC6+ÉϵÄC2-H6ÓëGDÉϵÄO35-H38Ö®¼ä´æÔÚÏ໥×÷Óá£ËùÒÔÈ¡µÄÊýÖµÓ¦¸ÃÈçÏ£ºÕâÑùÈ¡¶Ô²»¶Ôѽ£¿ Donor NBO (i) Acceptor NBO (j) E(2) kcal/mol 5. BD ( 1) C2 - H 6 BD*( 1) O 35 - H 38 49.29 44. BD ( 1) O35 - H38 BD*( 1) C 2 - H 6 3.12 127. LP ( 1) O 35 BD*( 1) C 2 - H 6 0.90 ÎÊÌâÈý£º within unit 1 £¬from unit 1 to unit 2£¬ from unit 2 to unit 1£¬ within unit 2¼ÙÈçÊÇ·ÖÎöÕû¸ö·Ö×ÓÖ®¼äµÄÏ໥×÷Ó㬵½µ×´ÓÄĸöÀïÃæÈ¥×î´óµÄÄØ£¬»¹ÊÇ˵ȡËùÓеÄÀïÃæ×î´óµÄÄØ£¿ ÎÒ¿´¹ýNBOÊä³öÎļþ¸÷²¿·ÖµÄº¬ÒåÏê½â.pdfºÍGUASSIANÖеÄNBO¼ÆËã½á¹û·ÖÎö.DOCÁË£¬¿ÉÊǶÔÓÚÉÏÃæµÄÎÊÌ⻹ÊǸ㲻Çå³þ¡£Ï£ÍûµÃµ½°ïÖú |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÇëÎÊËÄÇâß»à«ÈܽâµÄ¾ÛºÏÎïÓü״¼³Áµíʱ£¬ÈçºÎʹ³Áµí¹ý³Ì¼ÓËÙ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
Chemical Bonding at Surfaces and Interfaces,×î¾µäµÄÒ»±¾±íÃæÉÏ»¯Ñ§Ï໥×÷Óý̲Ä
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ211È˻ظ´
³ÏÑûÓÐ־֮ʿ¼ÓÈë½ËÕ´óѧ»·¾³Ñ§ÔººÏ³ÉÉúÎïѧ¿ÎÌâ×飡(³¤ÆÚ½ÓÊÕѧ˶ר˶¡¢Ë¶²©Á¬¶Á)
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄÏ´óÀíÂÛÓë¼ÆË㻯ѧ·½Ïò£¨070300£©342·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
»¶Ó»¯Ñ§¡¢»¯¹¤¡¢ÎïÀí¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢»ò¼ÆËã»ú±³¾°µÄ¿¼ÑÐ×Éѯ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÕÐÉú²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤¡¢»·¾³¿ÆÑ§µ÷¼ÁÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
µ÷¼ÁÕÐÉú
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ºÓÄÏÀí¹¤´óѧ»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉúÀ²£¡
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)

zhouwohua
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 28 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 295.3
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 193
- ÔÚÏß: 298Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1317586
- ×¢²á: 2011-06-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÀíÂۺͼÆË㻯ѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ÝæÔÂç÷ç÷: ½ð±Ò+30, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú, ·Ç³£¸Ðл£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒ»¹ÊÇû¸ãÇå³þµ½µ×ÊÇÔõô»ØÊ£¬ÆÚ´ýÄúµÄÔٴλش𡣠2013-04-21 10:32:20
ÝæÔÂç÷ç÷: ½ð±Ò+30, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú, ·Ç³£¸Ðл£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒ»¹ÊÇû¸ãÇå³þµ½µ×ÊÇÔõô»ØÊ£¬ÆÚ´ýÄúµÄÔٴλش𡣠2013-04-21 10:32:20
|
This is carried out by examining all possible interactions between "filled" (donor) Lewis-type NBOs and "empty" (acceptor) non-Lewis NBOs, and estimating their energetic importance by 2nd-order perturbation theory. Since these interactions lead to loss of occupancy from the localized NBOs of the idealized Lewis structure into the empty non-Lewis orbitals (and thus, to departures from the idealized Lewis structure description), they are referred to as "delocalization" corrections to the zeroth-order natural Lewis structure. For each donor NBO (i) and acceptor NBO 0, the stabilization energy E(2) associated with delocalization ("2e-stabilization7') i + j is estimated as E(2)=¡÷Eij=qi*F(i,j)^2/(Ej-Ei) where q, is the donor orbital occupancy, E,, E, are diagonal elements (orbital energies) and F(i,j) is the off-diagonal NBO Fock matrix element. [In the example above, the nN + a& interaction between the nitrogen lone pair (NBO 8) and the antiperiplanar C1-H3 antibond (NBO 24) is seen to give the strongest stabilization, 8.13 kcallmol.] As the heading indicates, entries are included in this table only when the interaction energy exceeds a default threshold of 0.5 kcallmol. |

4Â¥2013-04-19 21:30:52
ggdh
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +69 - QCÇ¿Ìû: 2
- Ó¦Öú: 52 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1747.4
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 697
- ÔÚÏß: 206.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 96968
- ×¢²á: 2005-11-08
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§ÉúÎïѧÓëÉúÎïÓлú»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: Á¿×Ó»¯Ñ§
2Â¥2013-04-04 14:42:12
ÝæÔÂç÷ç÷
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 934.1
- É¢½ð: 111
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 598
- ÔÚÏß: 147.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1241272
- ×¢²á: 2011-03-22
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ·ÖÀë¹ý³Ì

3Â¥2013-04-04 21:43:15
ÝæÔÂç÷ç÷
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 934.1
- É¢½ð: 111
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 598
- ÔÚÏß: 147.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1241272
- ×¢²á: 2011-03-22
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ·ÖÀë¹ý³Ì
|
ÄãºÃ£¬¸ÐлÄúµÄ»Ø´ð¡£Äã˵µÄÊDz»ÊÇÕâ¸öÒâ˼ѽ£ºµÚÎ岿·ÖÊÇͨ¹ý¶þ¼¶Î¢ÈÅÄܵļÆË㡣ȷ¶¨³É¼ü¹ìµÀ(BD)µç×ÓÓë·´¼ü¹ìµÀ(BD*)µç×Ó¼äËùÓпÉÄܵÄÏ໥×÷Óá£ÆäÎȶ¨»¯ÄÜE(2)´ú±í×ŵç×Ӵӳɼü£¨»òÕ¼¾Ý£©¹ìµÀÏò·´¼ü£¨»ò¿Õ¹ìµÀ£©×ªÒƵij̶ȣ¬¼´µç×ÓµÄÀëÓò»¯³Ì¶È¡£ ÎÒ»¹ÊÇŪ²»Ã÷°×µ½µ×ÊÇÔõôѡȡµÄ£¬¿´ÁËÏÂ×ÊÁÏҲû¿´Ã÷°×ѽ£¡Âé·³ÔÚ°ïÎÒ½â´ðϰɣ¬·Ç³£·Ç³£¸Ðл¡£ |

5Â¥2013-04-21 10:31:35













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥