24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wohenhao55

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.001
金币: 2472
帖子: 521
在线: 277小时
虫号: 1187520

[交流] 收到评审意见心情很沉重，不知道这篇文章还能不能中

有三个评审人

第一个：“In conclusion, the manuscript in present form is not acceptable and requires major revision or could be rejected.”

第二个：总共给出了7个需要修改的地方

第三个：“Nevertheless remains a feeling of an accumulation of experimental data with poor discussion. A careful rewriting of the manuscript, including English, should be necessary to improve the quality of the work. ”，同时给出了大约十项修改意见。

下面是编辑的回信：

Dear Dr. ***:
The paper that you submitted for publication in Polymer Engineering and Science, referenced above, has been reviewed and the comments of the referees are included at the bottom of this letter. You will note that they express some concerns regarding certain aspects of the paper. We would hope, however, that a significant reworking could result in an accommodation to the principal reviewer comments and to the editing comments.. We would thus welcome the preparation of a revision, which would be mutually acceptable.

Please note, however, that a revision must be submitted within six (6) months from the initial Manuscript decision date. Revisions received after this time will be treated as a new Manuscript.

You can upload your revised manuscript and submit it through your Author Center. Log into http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pes and enter your Author Center, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." PLEASE NOTE: We have your original files. When uploading your revised manuscript, delete the file(s) that you wish to replace and then upload the revised file(s). Make sure to click "Submit" when you are finished, or we will not receive your revision.

In the space provided, please include a cover letter describing how you responded to each of the comments from the reviewers and where the changes were made in the paper. **DO NOT mark the changes in the text as that text will not be suitable for publication** Failure to include that information will delay the processing of the revised manuscript.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Sincerely yours,
Pro.***

不知道还有没有中的可能，希望过来人能给个建议啊，

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

审稿意见

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

氰化钾0211

» 猜你喜欢

职称评审没过，求安慰已经有56人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有5人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-02-16 13:39:36

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

hhzjw

金虫 (正式写手)

SEPI: 1
应助: 32 (小学生)
贵宾: 0.001
金币: 5320.9
帖子: 825
在线: 1466.6小时
虫号: 1244024

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
wohenhao55: 金币+8, 论文问题确实不少，第一次投没啥经验，就当学经验了 2013-02-16 14:26:08

好好修吧，不好好修估计要悲剧
年前1个大修后换个牛叉审稿人，说我刻意回避1个审稿人的意见，直接给我挂了
有时候要回答好1个问题，那又是一篇论文
投论文得到负面的意见其实是好事，又多了自己可以深入的问题，自身可能不会注重
-----------------------------------------------
PS：大修时1个审稿人提到我建立的模型适用性如何？我回复现有模型的适用性都不好（实际情况），那么我的模型适用性也有很大的局限性。还有类似的刁钻问题，非常不好回答，我当时没太注意（这个审稿人估计是给reject且不接受修改稿的复审，其他2个是minor）。换个大牛，很快就悲剧了，其他2个没提什么意见了，但最终结果是主编倾向于大牛，送我忠告：认真对待审稿人的每一条意见。

[ Last edited by hhzjw on 2013-2-16 at 14:27 ]