| 查看: 12018 | 回复: 41 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
收到评审意见心情很沉重，不知道这篇文章还能不能中
|
||||
|
有三个评审人 第一个：“In conclusion, the manuscript in present form is not acceptable and requires major revision or could be rejected.” 第二个：总共给出了7个需要修改的地方 第三个：“Nevertheless remains a feeling of an accumulation of experimental data with poor discussion. A careful rewriting of the manuscript, including English, should be necessary to improve the quality of the work. ”，同时给出了大约十项修改意见。 下面是编辑的回信： Dear Dr. ***: The paper that you submitted for publication in Polymer Engineering and Science, referenced above, has been reviewed and the comments of the referees are included at the bottom of this letter. You will note that they express some concerns regarding certain aspects of the paper. We would hope, however, that a significant reworking could result in an accommodation to the principal reviewer comments and to the editing comments.. We would thus welcome the preparation of a revision, which would be mutually acceptable. Please note, however, that a revision must be submitted within six (6) months from the initial Manuscript decision date. Revisions received after this time will be treated as a new Manuscript. You can upload your revised manuscript and submit it through your Author Center. Log into http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pes and enter your Author Center, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." PLEASE NOTE: We have your original files. When uploading your revised manuscript, delete the file(s) that you wish to replace and then upload the revised file(s). Make sure to click "Submit" when you are finished, or we will not receive your revision. In the space provided, please include a cover letter describing how you responded to each of the comments from the reviewers and where the changes were made in the paper. **DO NOT mark the changes in the text as that text will not be suitable for publication** Failure to include that information will delay the processing of the revised manuscript. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely yours, Pro.*** 不知道还有没有中的可能，希望过来人能给个建议啊，  |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 审稿意见 |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
氰化钾0211» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
25楼2013-02-16 20:54:58
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
wohenhao55: 金币+1, 谢谢回复 2013-02-16 14:22:25
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
wohenhao55: 金币+1, 谢谢回复 2013-02-16 14:22:25
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2013-02-16 13:42:17
3楼2013-02-16 13:50:35
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
4楼2013-02-16 13:52:20
30