| 查看: 4261 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
botar木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
Surface and Coatings Technology 外审意见 major revision 帮我看看有希望不？
|
||
|
我因年龄家庭负担原因，选择在本单位在职读博，三年了，几乎是一个人的战斗，从还没有一篇SCI，2011-2013，两年多里投了五次稿，直接被拒掉四次，这次给了一个大修。请前辈们给把把脉，这些修改意见修改后有没有接受的希望？谢谢！祝大家新年快乐！ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dear Dr. **, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. Followling the advice of reviewer 2 I was considering to reject and recommend another journal. I still would like to encourage you to consider that option. Otherwise, please provide solid answers to the reviewers remarks. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. THE CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE MANUSCRIPT SHOULD BE HIGHLIGTHED IN COLOUR THROUGH THE TEXT OF THE REVISED MANUSCRIPT. You are expected to return your Revision by 10 May 2013. Yours sincerely, Surface and Coatings Technology Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: Comments to Author: two minor revisions are suggested 1. In page 5, para 2, there is a sudden appearance of word 'prickly ball'; I understand it is for the undissolved Cr3C2 carbide, but there is no mention about it in the test to confirm that what author meant as 'prickly ball' is the partially dissoved Cr3C2 2. The conclusion appears to be reproduction of the results; it is not 'concluding' your work. It can be rewritten with more impact so the 'conclusions' are clear and obvious. Reviewer #2: This is formally well written work with good thermodynamics analysis. However, in my opinion this work is not in the main scope of present journal. There is no novelty in the experimental part and thermodynamics analysis would better pass in some other journal like Materials Chemistry and Physics. I could not see the connection between experimental and theoretical investigations. * Highlights and conclusions do not make clear the novelty of this research. Highlight 1 and 4 bring the same information. * I can't agree with conclusions part in the introduction. Formation of M7C3 carbides in Fe-based matrixes is well known process, also industrially established for more than 30 years. * It is also not clear what is the link between calculations and experimental observations? How the dissolving of Cr3C2 does influence the nucleation behaviour? General remarks: * What was the vol. % of Cr3C2 powder in relation to matrix FeCrNiBSi powder? * I would not name Cr3C2 as "substrate", maybe a "source". Usually in coatings "substrate" means a base material to be coated. * Which way were the powders deposited - pasta, mixed together or separately? * If the main idea of this research was to analyse formation of M7C3 from Cr3C2 I would suggest to use pure Ni or Fe as matrix and to look on a simple system. By the used matrix composition high amount alloying elements influences the reaction processes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有9人回复
-
能否申诉？
已经有5人回复
-
为什么到现在没收到通知？
已经有5人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有8人回复
-
面上意见出来了
已经有18人回复
-
找导师
已经有7人回复
-
29号明天会评吗
已经有3人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有11人回复
-
我就是申请一个面上项目而已，这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧？
已经有11人回复
baoqiang133 
捐助贵宾 (小有名气)
高级翻译
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 97.5
- 散金: 1814
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 81
- 在线: 133.8小时
- 虫号: 2275474
- 注册: 2013-02-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 管理复杂性研究
20楼2013-02-10 00:21:17
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
botar2楼2013-02-09 11:33:12
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2013-02-09 12:17:42
4楼2013-02-09 13:59:02
10