24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

BJTerry

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 10 (幼儿园)
金币: 1578.2
散金: 683
红花: 5
帖子: 224
在线: 352.4小时
虫号: 1804539
注册: 2012-05-08
性别: GG
专业: 人工智能与知识工程

[交流] 论文返修后被拒，求帮忙看看拒信已有16人参与

论文投稿比较波折，时间至今已有半年了。文章负责人是副主编（在美国的华人），一审意见冲突，副主编要求增加审稿人审稿，增加后一审通过，但需要修改
本月3号提交的修改稿，昨天收到主编（印度人，不清楚为什么他来负责我的文章了）的被拒邮件。被拒所附的审稿内容居然和修改给的审稿意见一样，没有清楚写明被拒理由，我不知道是不是其中出现了什么问题，特附拒信，麻烦大家帮我看看，是不是编辑自己做出的决定拒搞了，谢谢。

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear author(s)

Ref: Submission "*****"

Your above mentioned submitted article has been read through several rounds of peer review. Unfortunately, the recommendation is that the article be rejected. We have come to the conclusion after a careful evaluation of your work. Articles submitted to the International Journal of *** are judged on their timeliness and novelty; significance to the field and potential impact on the course of future work in the area.

I would not advise you to revise the article in anything like its present form.
I am enclosing part of the referee's reports.

However, I do thank you for your interest in the International Journal of ***.

Best Wishes,

-------------------------------------

COMMENTS MADE BY REFEREES:
-------------------------

First Review:
-------------
The experiments conducted are based on only synthetic datasets - this might not be convincing enough to claim the superiority of the algorithm. Data from the real world (possibly multidimensional data) are recommended.

Second Review:
-------------
No
One major concern is the experimental settings, which should be depicted more detailed. Since the fault matrix A is generated randomly, the results are untrusted unless they are averaged by many runs. Similarly, since evolutionary algorithms are randomized algorithms in nature, i.e., their results may be unaccepted sometimes, the author(s) should state clearly whether the results is attained by one run or best of many runs, i.e., how much the variance of results is.

Another concern is that the paper fails to describe the IGA in detail. In line 5 of Algorithm 1, how the V is computed by matrix A? Since there are some techniques for crossover and mutation, what technique does the IGA use for crossover and mutation and why? In the abstract, the authors said appropriate termination criterion can improve the accuracy and efficiency of the algorithm, but they did not point out it clearly in this paper.

The third concern is the feasibility of two vaccines V_1 and V_2. Since LB is the lower bound of the solution and the author(s) did not prove LB is the tight lower bound, it may be not helpful or good to make the individual consisting of LB '1' in some cases. So the authors need to deal with this problem in order to make the paper more rigorous logically.

The grammar is generally acceptable, but more attention needs to be paid to raise the quality of polish. And there are some statements that need citations. For example, 'It has been proven that the minimal hitting set problem is NP-hard', 'Numerous studies show that it is far from enough for relying solely on evolutionary algorithm (such as genetic algorithm) to simulate human intelligence to deal with things' and so on.

I think the sentence below the equation (2) maybe wrong. If not, why the
author(s) give a different definition of 2-norm of vectors?

回复此楼