[½»Á÷] ͶÁËһƪ¸å¼þ£¬Ö÷±à¸ø³öÕâÑùµÄÒâ¼û£¿Ê²Ã´Òâ˼£¿ÒѾ­´óÐÞ¹ý£¬»¹ÐèÒª´óÐÞ£¿

Dear, I can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated the manuscript "As you will see from the comments below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/petrol/, publication in its present form is not recommended, and major revision is being requested. Please consider the reviews to see if revision would be feasible. Should you wish to resubmit you should explain how and where each point of the reviewers' comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked". Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. To facilitate further review, add line numbers in the text of your manuscript. Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors. Any new version should be returned within four months, as any resubmittal received after this time may, at the editor's discretion, be considered as a new paper. To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/petrol/ and log in as an author.  You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision. Kindly check to see if your classification keywords are still correct, at    http://ees.elsevier.com/petrol/l.asp?i=36624&l=X93PGEKP When resubmitting, please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues. I hope that you will find the comments to be of use to you. Kind regards, Dr. Birol Dindoruk Editor-in-Chief Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Kindly check to see if your classification keywords are still correct, at      http://ees.elsevier.com/petrol/l.asp?i=36625&l=QQ059YKK .......................................................... COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥