| ²é¿´: 1359 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
chenryÌú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÈ˸øÁËÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬È«ÊÇÊÖдµÄ£¬Áú·É·ïÎ裬Âé·³¸ßÊÖÀ´Ö¸µ¼Ò»ÏÂ
|
|

hhjubs
Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 270.8
- Ìû×Ó: 9
- ÔÚÏß: 10Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2144540
- ×¢²á: 2012-11-23
- רҵ: ÐźÅÀíÂÛÓëÐźŴ¦Àí
2Â¥2012-12-18 19:31:19
chenry
Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8.1
- É¢½ð: 25
- Ìû×Ó: 233
- ÔÚÏß: 56.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1017168
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-12
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÄÜÔ´»¯¹¤

3Â¥2012-12-18 23:34:11
weichin
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 183
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 9734.7
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 4116
- ÔÚÏß: 345.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1490943
- ×¢²á: 2011-11-14
- רҵ: ½á¹¹ÌÕ´É
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
chenry: ½ð±Ò+5, ·ÒëEPI+1, »¹Ã»¿´Í꣬±ØÐë¸øÄãÂú·Ö£¬Å£ÈË~ 2012-12-20 09:07:16
chenry: ½ð±Ò+5, ·ÒëEPI+1, »¹Ã»¿´Í꣬±ØÐë¸øÄãÂú·Ö£¬Å£ÈË~ 2012-12-20 09:07:16
|
Áú·É·ïÎèÕæÊDz»¼Ù£¬ÒÔϹ©²Î¿¼£¬¼Ó´Ö²¿·ÖÊDz»È·¶¨¡¢´ýÉÌȶµÄµØ·½¡£Äã´ÓרҵµÄ½Ç¶ÈÄܲ¸ö°Ë¾Å²»ÀëÊ®¡£ Image1: Particles must have been measured at the outlet of fluidized bed, that is the actual inflow of particles to weight loss method gross own two points Image2: Whereas even under steady state, the particle entrainment from a fluidized bed will change with time as of scars out of fine particles Image3: How segregation of particles avoid at fluidized bed, it should be a continuous particle entrainor rather that fluidized bed to be in steady state. Image4: Consider terms wettable or water loving (hydrophilic) and non-wettable (hydrophobic). Image5: Please ch¡Á¡Á¡Á glass bead should be hydrophobic and ash should be hydrophic. Image6: Need to indicate particle shapes, were they similar or different. Express by shape factor, pl. (please) consider. Image7: Need to mention where was desiccant used as fly ash when dried is a great desiccant, small, l/h (or l/n) Image8: Not clear how thin was measured, need to be explained. Image9: How about particles, were they spherical? |

4Â¥2012-12-20 08:51:04









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20