| ²é¿´: 782 | »Ø¸´: 6 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
unknownbqÒø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÁ½¾ä·Òë...лл~
|
|
| The epistemology of empiricism, basded solely on sensations and constructions from them, was not the way of Galileo, nor of Descartes, Arnauld, Huyghens, Hobbes,Boyle or others. Yet, on my view these men well all neo-Protagoreans, as were the empiricists, e.g., Locke and Berkeley. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
307·Ö²ÄÁÏרҵÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0855Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
332Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¼×´¼/¶þÂÈ 1:15¹ýÖù×Ó
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
272Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷±±Å©ÁÖÐóÄÁר˶336·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
220chengeng
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- ·ÒëEPI: 89
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.028
- ½ð±Ò: 2827.3
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 238
- ÔÚÏß: 195.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 484710
- ×¢²á: 2007-12-27
- רҵ: ½»Í¨¹¤³Ì
2Â¥2012-12-06 12:18:45
¸¡³¾×Ó
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- ·ÒëEPI: 32
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1597.8
- Ìû×Ó: 163
- ÔÚÏß: 42.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 236161
- ×¢²á: 2006-04-02
- רҵ: ũҵÀ¥³æÑ§
3Â¥2012-12-06 12:53:22
¸¡³¾×Ó
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- ·ÒëEPI: 32
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1597.8
- Ìû×Ó: 163
- ÔÚÏß: 42.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 236161
- ×¢²á: 2006-04-02
- רҵ: ũҵÀ¥³æÑ§
4Â¥2012-12-06 12:56:16
unknownbq
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 999.3
- Ìû×Ó: 132
- ÔÚÏß: 72Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1434045
- ×¢²á: 2011-10-09
- רҵ: »·¾³ÎÛȾ»¯Ñ§
5Â¥2012-12-06 13:20:16
BenС×Ó
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 778.3
- É¢½ð: 679
- ºì»¨: 29
- Ìû×Ó: 4445
- ÔÚÏß: 522.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2149064
- ×¢²á: 2012-11-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É
6Â¥2012-12-06 13:22:40
220chengeng
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- ·ÒëEPI: 89
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.028
- ½ð±Ò: 2827.3
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 238
- ÔÚÏß: 195.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 484710
- ×¢²á: 2007-12-27
- רҵ: ½»Í¨¹¤³Ì
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
unknownbq: ½ð±Ò+15, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2012-12-06 14:13:24
unknownbq: ½ð±Ò+15, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2012-12-06 14:13:24
|
The epistemology of empiricism, based solely on sensations and constructions from them, was not the way of Galileo, nor of Descartes, Arnauld, Huyghens, Hobbes, Boyle or others. Yet, on my view these men well all neo-Protagoreans, as were the empiricists, e.g., Locke and Berkeley. ¾ÑéÖ÷ÒåÈÏʶÂÛ½ö½öÖ»»ùÓÚ¾ÑéÖ÷ÒåÕß×ÔÉíµÄ¸Ð¾õºÍ¸ÅÄî¹¹½¨£¬ÕâÒ»µãÓëÙ¤ÀûÂÔ¡¢ÒÔ¼°°¢¶ûŵ¡¢µÑ¿¨¶ù¡¢»Ý¸ü˹¡¢»ô²¼Ë¹ºÍ²¨Òå¶úµÈÈ˵ÄÀíÄî´óÏàåÉÍ¥¡£È»¶ø£¬ÔÚÎÒ¿´À´£¬ÕâЩÈ˶¼ÊôÓÚÐÂÆÕÂÞÌ©¸êÀÅÉ£¬¶ø¾ÑéÖ÷ÒåÕßÒ²ÊôÓÚÐÂÆÕÂÞÌ©¸êÀÅÉ£¬ÈçÂå¿ËºÍ²®¿ËÀûµÈ¡£ ÓÉÓÚûÓÐÉÏÏÂÎIJ»ÊÇÌØ±ðÇå³þ£¬ÎÒ×Ô¼º²Â²âÕâÀïÊDz»ÊÇÔÚ½øÐйéÀà°¡£¬Òâ˼ÊÇÐÂÆÕÂÞÌ©¸êÀÅɵÄÈËδ±Ø¶¼ÊǾÑéÖ÷ÒåÕߣ¬»òÕßÊǾÑéÖ÷ÒåÕßÒ²´ó¶àÊôÓÚÐÂÆÕÂÞÌ©¸êÀÅÉ¡£Ù¤ÀûÂÔµÈÈËÊôÓÚÐÂÆÕÂÞÌ©¸êÀÅÉ£¬µ«È´²»ÊǾÑéÖ÷ÒåÕߣ¬Äú¿´ÁËÎÄÕµģ¬ÎÒÀí½â´íÁËÂ𣿠|
7Â¥2012-12-06 14:06:35














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥