24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1193  |  回复: 6
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhangliangmiao

铜虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 求助审稿人这个问题该如何回答?急,在线等!

审稿意见如下:
In the 1st line of page 6, the authors suggested that no defect were observed at the junction from the HRTEM of the junction. However, one cannot claim the nonexistence of defects merely from HRTEM. In fact, edge dislocation may easily observed by the HRTEM, while the screw dislocation may not. Therefore, the authors need more evidence to prove their conclusion. According to Jin and co-workers, they used a Diffraction Contrast TEM (DCTEM) to suggest the existence of defect. (Jin et al, Science 2008, 320, 1060)
我从来没有过这个DCTEM,也不想再加了,能否将原文里的肯定的说法""No defects are observed at the junction.删掉.然后强调the screw dislocation need further characterization.
这样审稿人能认可吗?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mushichun

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
avast2009: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-10-20 09:22:31
老实说一下没有条件做这个实验,如果不影响实验结论,可以考虑一下你的修改方案,交给编辑去评判
http://www.polymer.cn/ss/shichunmu/index.html
5楼2012-10-19 21:36:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhangliangmiao 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见