24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 4192  |  回复: 31

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] reject and resubmission 大家给我看看审稿意见

投了一篇sci ,审稿意见如下:
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s), I must decline the manuscript for publication in the European Food Research and Technology at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments.
Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered.
You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.
Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://and login to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.
Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the European Food Research and Technology, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.
I look forward to a resubmission.
Sincerely,

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I strongly recommend that English language must be checked throughout the text.
Abstract should be re-organized as: objective, methods, results and conclusion.
I think the Keywords are not appropriate. (maybe:......)
In the Introduction section, I think it would be better to focus on the possible functional properties of ** (is there any?) and then, show that there is no information about its **potential (page 2, lines 56 and 57; page 3, lines 4 to 7).
Lines 10 to 12, Introduction section: Use past tense.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
-English should be greatly improved.
-Figure 1: the legend does not correspond to the figure.
-Figures 1 and 2 should be merged.
-I do not understand in Table 1 the basis on which component the concentration degree was calculated.
-It is not easy to understand that......
-Figure shows, not Figure showed.
-The abbreviation of tryptophan is Trp, not Try.
请问1、 我这个还有希望吗?是不是就是已经拒稿了?只是主编很婉转!
2、如果重新投稿,也没有给出投稿时间,要多久返回?
3、更重要的是,信中说拒稿重投这已经很严重了,似乎说明稿子不好,但审稿人的意见为什么这么少?没有实质性的问题。主要是语言和一点小毛病。按照审稿意见也就是小修吧。 不知道接收的几率大不大?
4、 有人投过european food research and technology ,reject and resubmission 后被接受的吗?

[ Last edited by 猪会飞 on 2012-10-18 at 11:40 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-10-18 07:55:45
猪会飞: 金币+10, 代发帖人发放 2012-10-18 11:39:35
sunying625: 金币+10 2013-03-02 10:26:36
这个机会很大,啊,虽然是大修,主要是第一个审稿人的意见修改难一些,第二个的基本就是语言和格式问题,容易修改
所以一定不要放弃,修改后重投,这个相当于大修

major revision 一般在3个月内修回即可,O(∩_∩)O~
2楼2012-10-17 17:48:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
大修。好好修改,有机会
5楼2012-10-17 19:38:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by wellyy2005 at 2012-10-17 17:48:20
这个机会很大,啊,虽然是大修,主要是第一个审稿人的意见修改难一些,第二个的基本就是语言和格式问题,容易修改
所以一定不要放弃,修改后重投,这个相当于大修

major revision 一般在3个月内修回即可,O(∩_ ...

以前看过你回复别人的帖子,今天能得到你的指导感觉很亲切谢谢!
3楼2012-10-17 18:17:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

对啊,按照审稿人的意见一条一条的,一点一点的回答修改,不要疑惑,审稿人的意见就是真理,能修改的尽量修改,不能实现的说明理由或给出参考文献支持你的意见。
4楼2012-10-17 19:02:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

whzwcm

木虫 (著名写手)

劲升

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-10-18 07:55:58
好好修改,有机会

初步接收了,恭喜
Believe myself!有志者事意成,加油!
6楼2012-10-17 19:47:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

看到大家的支持,似乎看到希望了!谢谢大家鼓励!
7楼2012-10-17 21:22:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
你这不重投,会亏大了。不过要认真修改,特别是语言。
8楼2012-10-17 21:38:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

难道这个杂志没有大修这项吗?为什么给我拒绝并重投呢?专家给的意见却那么少!看专家的意见似乎属于小修!感觉主编和专家的意见都矛盾!是不是审稿人不专业啊?其实自己都觉得稿子写的不好!哎!!
9楼2012-10-17 21:42:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

glassman782

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-10-18 07:56:04
感觉英语修改好了的话,再按审稿人的意见改,还是有希望的。
10楼2012-10-17 21:46:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 sunying625 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见