24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 156.4
散金: 352
红花: 2
帖子: 142
在线: 57.2小时
虫号: 401207
注册: 2007-06-13
性别: MM
专业: 食品科学基础

[求助] reject and resubmission 大家给我看看审稿意见

投了一篇sci ，审稿意见如下：
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s), I must decline the manuscript for publication in the European Food Research and Technology at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments.
Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered.
You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.
Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://and login to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.
Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the European Food Research and Technology, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.
I look forward to a resubmission.
Sincerely,

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I strongly recommend that English language must be checked throughout the text.
Abstract should be re-organized as: objective, methods, results and conclusion.
I think the Keywords are not appropriate. (maybe:......)
In the Introduction section, I think it would be better to focus on the possible functional properties of ** (is there any?) and then, show that there is no information about its **potential (page 2, lines 56 and 57; page 3, lines 4 to 7).
Lines 10 to 12, Introduction section: Use past tense.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
-English should be greatly improved.
-Figure 1: the legend does not correspond to the figure.
-Figures 1 and 2 should be merged.
-I do not understand in Table 1 the basis on which component the concentration degree was calculated.
-It is not easy to understand that......
-Figure shows, not Figure showed.
-The abbreviation of tryptophan is Trp, not Try.
请问1、我这个还有希望吗？是不是就是已经拒稿了？只是主编很婉转！
2、如果重新投稿，也没有给出投稿时间，要多久返回？
3、更重要的是，信中说拒稿重投这已经很严重了，似乎说明稿子不好，但审稿人的意见为什么这么少？没有实质性的问题。主要是语言和一点小毛病。按照审稿意见也就是小修吧。不知道接收的几率大不大？
4、有人投过european food research and technology ,reject and resubmission 后被接受的吗？

[ Last edited by 猪会飞 on 2012-10-18 at 11:40 ]

回复此楼

1楼2012-10-17 17:35:24

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 156.4
散金: 352
红花: 2
帖子: 142
在线: 57.2小时
虫号: 401207
注册: 2007-06-13
性别: MM
专业: 食品科学基础

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by wellyy2005 at 2012-10-17 17:48:20
这个机会很大，啊，虽然是大修，主要是第一个审稿人的意见修改难一些，第二个的基本就是语言和格式问题，容易修改
所以一定不要放弃，修改后重投，这个相当于大修

major revision 一般在3个月内修回即可，O(∩_ ...

以前看过你回复别人的帖子，今天能得到你的指导感觉很亲切谢谢！