| 查看: 5161 | 回复: 31 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
sunying625铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
reject and resubmission 大家给我看看审稿意见
|
||
|
投了一篇sci ，审稿意见如下： In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s), I must decline the manuscript for publication in the European Food Research and Technology at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://and login to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the European Food Research and Technology, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission. I look forward to a resubmission. Sincerely, Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author I strongly recommend that English language must be checked throughout the text. Abstract should be re-organized as: objective, methods, results and conclusion. I think the Keywords are not appropriate. (maybe:......) In the Introduction section, I think it would be better to focus on the possible functional properties of ** (is there any?) and then, show that there is no information about its **potential (page 2, lines 56 and 57; page 3, lines 4 to 7). Lines 10 to 12, Introduction section: Use past tense. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author -English should be greatly improved. -Figure 1: the legend does not correspond to the figure. -Figures 1 and 2 should be merged. -I do not understand in Table 1 the basis on which component the concentration degree was calculated. -It is not easy to understand that...... -Figure shows, not Figure showed. -The abbreviation of tryptophan is Trp, not Try. 请问1、 我这个还有希望吗？是不是就是已经拒稿了？只是主编很婉转！ 2、如果重新投稿，也没有给出投稿时间，要多久返回？ 3、更重要的是，信中说拒稿重投这已经很严重了，似乎说明稿子不好，但审稿人的意见为什么这么少？没有实质性的问题。主要是语言和一点小毛病。按照审稿意见也就是小修吧。 不知道接收的几率大不大？ 4、 有人投过european food research and technology ,reject and resubmission 后被接受的吗？ [ Last edited by 猪会飞 on 2012-10-18 at 11:40 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 我的收藏 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 有关老外评审专家的意见。
已经有7人回复
- reject & resubmission 还有戏吗？
已经有16人回复
- RSC的杂志，拒稿重投（reject and resubmssion）还需要回复审稿人意见吗？
已经有6人回复
- reject with resubmission帮忙看看
已经有3人回复
- IEEE CL 第二次Reject (resubmission allowed) 了
已经有12人回复
- IEEE CL Reject (resubmission allowed) 沮丧……
已经有38人回复
- 咨询reject and resubmission 状态，此文章接受的几率有多大?
已经有8人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
5楼2012-10-17 19:38:04
wellyy2005
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
s
- SEPI: 5
- 应助: 911 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.81
- 金币: 34048.3
- 散金: 7213
- 红花: 74
- 沙发: 32
- 帖子: 15755
- 在线: 1752.8小时
- 虫号: 498546
- 注册: 2008-02-04
- 专业: 肿瘤综合治疗
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-10-18 07:55:45
猪会飞: 金币+10, 代发帖人发放 2012-10-18 11:39:35
sunying625: 金币+10 2013-03-02 10:26:36
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-10-18 07:55:45
猪会飞: 金币+10, 代发帖人发放 2012-10-18 11:39:35
sunying625: 金币+10 2013-03-02 10:26:36
|
这个机会很大，啊，虽然是大修，主要是第一个审稿人的意见修改难一些，第二个的基本就是语言和格式问题，容易修改 所以一定不要放弃，修改后重投，这个相当于大修 major revision 一般在3个月内修回即可，O(∩_∩)O~ |
2楼2012-10-17 17:48:20
sunying625
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 156.4
- 散金: 352
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 142
- 在线: 57.2小时
- 虫号: 401207
- 注册: 2007-06-13
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 食品科学基础
3楼2012-10-17 18:17:02
wellyy2005
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
s
- SEPI: 5
- 应助: 911 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.81
- 金币: 34048.3
- 散金: 7213
- 红花: 74
- 沙发: 32
- 帖子: 15755
- 在线: 1752.8小时
- 虫号: 498546
- 注册: 2008-02-04
- 专业: 肿瘤综合治疗
4楼2012-10-17 19:02:46
30