24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (1390)
>导师招生 (738)
>虫友互识 (363)
>休闲灌水 (354)
>招聘信息布告栏 (123)
>博后之家 (69)
>论文投稿 (43)
>硕博家园 (32)
>教师之家 (30)
>考研 (24)
>公派出国 (16)
>学术会议 (14)
>考博 (13)
>生物科学 (10)
>基金申请 (9)
>找工作 (6)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

huguangdong

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 68 (初中生)
金币: 10532.4
散金: 858
红花: 102
帖子: 4271
在线: 1581.2小时
虫号: 1009663
注册: 2010-05-01
专业: 畜牧学

[求助] Plos One 杂志投稿问题

PLOS ONE这个杂志如果第一次因为语言和图片处理的原因拒稿，然后通过修改语言和图片质量能不能重新投该杂志，编辑对于本论文的内容还是肯定的？大家谁有这方面的经验不吝赐教？急等啊！以下是编辑回复：
PONE-D-12-28282
Characteristics of a newly immortalized swine small intestinal epithelial cell line
PLOS ONE

Dear Mrs Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected.

Specifically, the writing style and the figure quality does not meet our publication criteria. The reviewer and editor had difficulty to verify the data discussed in your manuscript. The study on an immortalized swine small intestinal epithelial cell line has its merit. I encourage you to significantly improve your manuscript and submit it as a new paper.

I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely,

Jun Sun, Ph.D.
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The authors tried to present data on the generation and characterization of an immortalized swine small intestinal epithelial cell line. However, the English used in this manuscript is very poor and barely intelligible, with numerous errors in grammar and style throughout. The figures (too many) are of poor quality and there are no numbers or titles on the figures to identify them. To make it worse, when figures are referred to in the text, the figures were not numbered by the sequence they appear. Therefore, there is no way to match them. The authors should seek professional editorial help before submitting the manuscript to any journal. Because PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. This reviewer will reject this paper because it does not meet the basic journal standards.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be accessible only via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

- - - - -
For journal use only: PONEDEC3

回复此楼