投了PlosOne, 不到一个月就来了意见是revision.
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit, but is not suitable for publication as it currently stands. Therefore, my decision is "Major Revision."
只有一个审稿人的意见,估计是学术editor的。
Reviewer #1: The authors study the ..... ... The principle is interesting, since ...., but the paper is not sounding to me. It is not well-organized, it is hard to follow and fails to demonstrate the point of the research. I think that the main point of the paper does not justify such a long paper. I am not satisfied by the quality of the figures, which should be more rigorous and clear. ...(这里指出了一个具体的问题,很容易follow和修改的). The discussion about results has to be deeply improved as well as the other sections.
In conclusion my opinion is that a deep revision is needed to evaluate the suitability of the paper.
看完我就傻眼了。这样的意见怎么修改啊?非常短,泛,没有具体的指证。
感觉我要做的事情是:
1)重写这篇文章,缩短。这个很难啊,不知道从什么地方下手。
2)重画所有的图。但是不知道要具体修改什么,我能做的是提高画面的精度,画得细致一点。
3)修改那个具体的问题,这个好做。
感觉这个审稿人对文章的想法内容是认可的,就是看不太懂细节,然后不想认真
指出来,就给了这么个笼统的意见。
上次投plosone,也是大修,但是给了很多具体的意见,就知道往什么问题上改。后来认真修改还是过了。
这个,,,我可以写信问editor能不能给出更具体的意见吗?
请各位重友帮忙。我新注册的,还不太会撒金币,多提醒我,见谅啊!
多谢先 |