| 查看: 2241 | 回复: 8 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
qifugang木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
这种情况可以argue吗？审稿人认为不适合发letter，应该写成长文章……
|
|
|
前段时间投了一篇materials letters，审稿人认为我做的好，而且有新意，但是letter篇幅太短，不适合，建议写成长文章……，就因为这个原因拒了。 问问大家，这种可以argue吧！ 还有怎么argue呢，请有经验的帮忙一下，小弟不胜感激！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
qifugang
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3592.5
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 168
- 在线: 342.8小时
- 虫号: 727051
- 注册: 2009-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属结构材料
9楼2012-09-20 08:47:14
liufuliang
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 61.9
- 散金: 1273
- 红花: 4
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 7909
- 在线: 274.7小时
- 虫号: 98678
- 注册: 2005-11-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 病原细菌与放线菌生物学
2楼2012-09-18 17:53:28
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
qifugang: 金币+5, ★有帮助 2012-09-18 19:12:17
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
qifugang: 金币+5, ★有帮助 2012-09-18 19:12:17
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2012-09-18 18:41:30
qifugang
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3592.5
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 168
- 在线: 342.8小时
- 虫号: 727051
- 注册: 2009-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属结构材料
|
Dear**** Thank you for submitting the above paper. We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down. For your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We will be happy to receive other contributions from you. Yours sincerely, Professor T.G. Nieh Editor Materials Letters Editor's/Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: This article presents experimental results of ****. For this newly developed alloy system with wide range of alloy composition, more information about the phase diagram and phase formation should be provided to make all the heat treatment results more meaningful. The authors have devoted considerable effort on the interesting subject of alloy design of ** base alloys. However, I don't think the authors can present a comprehensive summary for readers of short communications. I would suggest the authors to present their results in a full paper instead of in a short communication. |
4楼2012-09-18 19:11:36
