24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4407  |  回复: 18

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 初审意见大修

6月18日投的稿,9月9日才回初审意见。只有一个审稿人,大修。现摘录意见如下:
    主编:
    The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also require some mandatory changes to your manuscript before possible acceptance.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.

    副主编:
    Your manuscript has been reviewed by an expert, who unfortunately has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication.  His comments are attached for your information.  Please note that in the event of a major revision, it is mandatory to address all concerns raised by reviewers to their satisfaction, and therefore make sure to carefully consider his comments when preparing a revision.
    I agree with the reviewer that the paper presents already known material and in your contribution should be clearly highlighted in comparison to existing work.

    审稿人:
    In my opinion, this paper's contribution is that it analyzed in depth the relationship between the * and the **. (For ***, it is abvious that the phenomenon is affected by the ***. And, there is no indepth analysis on the *** compared to * in this paper.) The analysis is interesting.
    However, I was not able to find a huge contribution in this paper because the system is very popular, and most arguements or issues are from the measurements. I couldn't find an idea such as solution and system proposal for resolving the phenomenon. In addition, this paper doesn't provide information on how to get data or how to measure.
    My conclusion is that while this paper seems to be interesting and discusses potentailly important issues, the reviewer has several comments which have to be further addressed.
    审稿人写了六个意见,其中第三个比较难以完成:
    3.  If possible, could you provide more specific solution (e.g. a new system proposal) for improving efficiency in the ** phenomenon?
    只有一个月的时间上交修改稿。要再重新想一个实验,做实验,得到结果比较不切合实际。

    大家觉得还有戏吗?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

ethange

金虫 (初入文坛)

我觉得希望很大哈。9楼说得不错,对审稿人的每条意见一定要给出有理有据的回复,按自己认为对的就可以啦。
ee
17楼2014-01-15 14:00:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
othanda: 金币+2 2012-09-09 22:31:43
很专业的审稿意见~尽全力改改看吧~~
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
2楼2012-09-09 19:44:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ll9999

专家顾问 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
othanda: 金币+2 2012-09-09 22:31:36
没有关系,别人说是“If possible, ",并没有强求啊。
3楼2012-09-09 19:51:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
猪会飞: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-09-09 22:25:22
othanda: 金币+4 2012-09-09 22:31:29
这个太有戏不过了,认真修改,尽量补充吧。实在不能做就好好解释,需要时间,延长一些天最好,那样没有问题。
4楼2012-09-09 19:54:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by visitor958 at 2012-09-09 19:54:09
这个太有戏不过了,认真修改,尽量补充吧。实在不能做就好好解释,需要时间,延长一些天最好,那样没有问题。

嗯,也只能这样了。副主编说  has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication。真是要哭了。。。
5楼2012-09-09 20:10:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by ll9999 at 2012-09-09 19:51:52
没有关系,别人说是“If possible, ",并没有强求啊。

但愿能有好结果吧
6楼2012-09-09 20:44:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

★ ★
猪会飞: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-09-09 22:27:31
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by othanda at 2012-09-09 20:10:51
嗯,也只能这样了。副主编说  has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication。真是要哭了。。。...

这个是常见语气,就是要你认真修改,不要偷懒(比如能做的不做,找借口)。。。
7楼2012-09-09 20:48:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wumin_1283

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
othanda: 金币+2 2012-09-09 22:31:15
只要认真尽可能的修改,希望还是很大的。加油吧!
8楼2012-09-09 20:51:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
othanda: 金币+2 2012-09-09 22:31:06
能上的机会还是很大的。
实验你觉得补不了,你就仔细说明你的理由。有时审稿人的意见不必完全照做,但是一定要说明你的观点。
9楼2012-09-09 21:06:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by 独步青云 at 2012-09-09 21:06:21
能上的机会还是很大的。
实验你觉得补不了,你就仔细说明你的理由。有时审稿人的意见不必完全照做,但是一定要说明你的观点。

谢谢你的帮助~
10楼2012-09-09 22:30:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 othanda 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +10 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 10/500 2026-08-24 21:03 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +6 scalable 2026-08-24 6/300 2026-08-24 20:28 by 苦寒来香
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +9 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 10/500 2026-08-24 20:08 by 苦寒来香
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +17 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 21/1050 2026-08-24 14:21 by refreshing11
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +7 wangzilk 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-24 10:50 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 20+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-24 10:20 by echo8914667
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +4 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 4/200 2026-08-24 08:47 by gloomy6159
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +24 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 26/1300 2026-08-22 17:43 by kammury
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +16 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-22 16:12 by 阿布Abu
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +11 yuleib84 2026-08-18 12/600 2026-08-20 11:09 by xskun
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
信息提示
请填处理意见