| 查看: 4432 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
othanda木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 初审意见大修
|
||
|
6月18日投的稿，9月9日才回初审意见。只有一个审稿人，大修。现摘录意见如下： 主编： The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also require some mandatory changes to your manuscript before possible acceptance. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. 副主编： Your manuscript has been reviewed by an expert, who unfortunately has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication. His comments are attached for your information. Please note that in the event of a major revision, it is mandatory to address all concerns raised by reviewers to their satisfaction, and therefore make sure to carefully consider his comments when preparing a revision. I agree with the reviewer that the paper presents already known material and in your contribution should be clearly highlighted in comparison to existing work. 审稿人： In my opinion, this paper's contribution is that it analyzed in depth the relationship between the * and the **. (For ***, it is abvious that the phenomenon is affected by the ***. And, there is no indepth analysis on the *** compared to * in this paper.) The analysis is interesting. However, I was not able to find a huge contribution in this paper because the system is very popular, and most arguements or issues are from the measurements. I couldn't find an idea such as solution and system proposal for resolving the phenomenon. In addition, this paper doesn't provide information on how to get data or how to measure. My conclusion is that while this paper seems to be interesting and discusses potentailly important issues, the reviewer has several comments which have to be further addressed. 审稿人写了六个意见，其中第三个比较难以完成： 3. If possible, could you provide more specific solution (e.g. a new system proposal) for improving efficiency in the ** phenomenon? 只有一个月的时间上交修改稿。要再重新想一个实验，做实验，得到结果比较不切合实际。 大家觉得还有戏吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
梦想
已经有7人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有8人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
17楼2014-01-15 14:00:08
rockinuk
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- SEPI: 10
- 应助: 1512 (讲师)
- 金币: 7810.9
- 散金: 189
- 红花: 106
- 帖子: 3982
- 在线: 570.6小时
- 虫号: 1945379
- 注册: 2012-08-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 数论
2楼2012-09-09 19:44:11
ll9999
专家顾问 (文坛精英)
-
专家经验: +584 - SEPI: 2
- 应助: 8021 (教授)
- 贵宾: 60.073
- 金币: 290579
- 散金: 2941
- 红花: 710
- 沙发: 28
- 帖子: 37510
- 在线: 3178.5小时
- 虫号: 1410396
- 注册: 2011-09-21
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 区域发展管理
- 管辖: 电脑使用
3楼2012-09-09 19:51:52
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
4楼2012-09-09 19:54:09
20