应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 求助完结 » IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 初审意见大修
51/1返回列表
查看: 3281  |  回复: 18
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 初审意见大修

6月18日投的稿，9月9日才回初审意见。只有一个审稿人，大修。现摘录意见如下：
    主编：
    The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also require some mandatory changes to your manuscript before possible acceptance.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.

    副主编：
    Your manuscript has been reviewed by an expert, who unfortunately has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication.  His comments are attached for your information.  Please note that in the event of a major revision, it is mandatory to address all concerns raised by reviewers to their satisfaction, and therefore make sure to carefully consider his comments when preparing a revision.
    I agree with the reviewer that the paper presents already known material and in your contribution should be clearly highlighted in comparison to existing work.

    审稿人：
    In my opinion, this paper's contribution is that it analyzed in depth the relationship between the * and the **. (For ***, it is abvious that the phenomenon is affected by the ***. And, there is no indepth analysis on the *** compared to * in this paper.) The analysis is interesting.
    However, I was not able to find a huge contribution in this paper because the system is very popular, and most arguements or issues are from the measurements. I couldn't find an idea such as solution and system proposal for resolving the phenomenon. In addition, this paper doesn't provide information on how to get data or how to measure.
    My conclusion is that while this paper seems to be interesting and discusses potentailly important issues, the reviewer has several comments which have to be further addressed.
    审稿人写了六个意见，其中第三个比较难以完成：
    3.  If possible, could you provide more specific solution (e.g. a new system proposal) for improving efficiency in the ** phenomenon?
    只有一个月的时间上交修改稿。要再重新想一个实验，做实验，得到结果比较不切合实际。

    大家觉得还有戏吗？
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2012-09-09 19:37:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
猪会飞: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-09-09 22:25:22
othanda: 金币+4 2012-09-09 22:31:29
这个太有戏不过了，认真修改，尽量补充吧。实在不能做就好好解释，需要时间，延长一些天最好，那样没有问题。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2012-09-09 19:54:09
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
othanda: 金币+2 2012-09-09 22:31:43
很专业的审稿意见~尽全力改改看吧~~
赞一下 回复此楼
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
2楼2012-09-09 19:44:11
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ll9999

专家顾问 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
othanda: 金币+2 2012-09-09 22:31:36
没有关系，别人说是“If possible, ",并没有强求啊。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-09-09 19:51:52
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by visitor958 at 2012-09-09 19:54:09
这个太有戏不过了，认真修改，尽量补充吧。实在不能做就好好解释，需要时间，延长一些天最好，那样没有问题。

嗯，也只能这样了。副主编说  has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication。真是要哭了。。。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2012-09-09 20:10:51
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭