24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (1963)
>导师招生 (778)
>休闲灌水 (386)
>虫友互识 (370)
>招聘信息布告栏 (124)
>论文投稿 (78)
>博后之家 (73)
>硕博家园 (34)
>教师之家 (32)
>考研 (28)
>文献求助 (24)
>学术会议 (22)
>考博 (18)
>公派出国 (18)
>基金申请 (14)
>生物科学 (10)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

othanda

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 4712.1
散金: 150
红花: 4
帖子: 141
在线: 246.6小时
虫号: 1830519
注册: 2012-05-23
性别: GG
专业: 电力电子学

[求助] IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 初审意见大修

6月18日投的稿，9月9日才回初审意见。只有一个审稿人，大修。现摘录意见如下：
主编：
The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also require some mandatory changes to your manuscript before possible acceptance.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.

副主编：
Your manuscript has been reviewed by an expert, who unfortunately has some serious concerns on its suitability for publication.  His comments are attached for your information.  Please note that in the event of a major revision, it is mandatory to address all concerns raised by reviewers to their satisfaction, and therefore make sure to carefully consider his comments when preparing a revision.
I agree with the reviewer that the paper presents already known material and in your contribution should be clearly highlighted in comparison to existing work.

审稿人：
In my opinion, this paper's contribution is that it analyzed in depth the relationship between the * and the **. (For ***, it is abvious that the phenomenon is affected by the ***. And, there is no indepth analysis on the *** compared to * in this paper.) The analysis is interesting.
However, I was not able to find a huge contribution in this paper because the system is very popular, and most arguements or issues are from the measurements. I couldn't find an idea such as solution and system proposal for resolving the phenomenon. In addition, this paper doesn't provide information on how to get data or how to measure.
My conclusion is that while this paper seems to be interesting and discusses potentailly important issues, the reviewer has several comments which have to be further addressed.
审稿人写了六个意见，其中第三个比较难以完成：
3.  If possible, could you provide more specific solution (e.g. a new system proposal) for improving efficiency in the ** phenomenon?
只有一个月的时间上交修改稿。要再重新想一个实验，做实验，得到结果比较不切合实际。

大家觉得还有戏吗？

回复此楼